Skip to content

Conversation

@cheney-lin
Copy link
Member

What type of PR is this?

Features

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

@cheney-lin cheney-lin requested a review from xu282934741 as a code owner May 12, 2025 11:16
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 12, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 57.43802% with 103 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 58.65%. Comparing base (5d84bc7) to head (9b993db).
⚠️ Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...n/qosaware/resource/cpu/isolation/isolator_perf.go 45.71% 86 Missing and 9 partials ⚠️
.../sysadvisor/qosaware/resource/cpu/cpu_isolation.go 64.28% 5 Missing ⚠️
...sysadvisor/plugin/qosaware/resource/cpu/advisor.go 92.30% 2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #848      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   58.78%   58.65%   -0.14%     
==========================================
  Files         678      679       +1     
  Lines       76614    76839     +225     
==========================================
+ Hits        45039    45069      +30     
- Misses      27255    27430     +175     
- Partials     4320     4340      +20     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittest 58.65% <57.43%> (-0.14%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 17 times, most recently from b8763bc to 8fdf1a2 Compare May 21, 2025 02:08
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 2 times, most recently from abb2bea to 230a25d Compare May 21, 2025 08:10
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 5 times, most recently from ec30830 to 0da00fc Compare May 29, 2025 12:14
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch from 0da00fc to 9bc77de Compare September 9, 2025 01:36
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 4 times, most recently from b609a1f to 9ee4091 Compare October 1, 2025 06:31
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 10 times, most recently from b19b903 to 803a824 Compare October 24, 2025 01:59
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 4 times, most recently from 8d67ab1 to e47033e Compare November 4, 2025 02:53
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 3 times, most recently from 72c3f64 to 56b8955 Compare November 12, 2025 09:16
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch 7 times, most recently from 430de8f to f21a886 Compare November 24, 2025 07:23
align cpuset with L3 cache

Signed-off-by: linzhecheng <[email protected]>
@cheney-lin cheney-lin force-pushed the dev/isolation_by_cpu_util branch from f21a886 to f8ad84d Compare November 26, 2025 02:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant