Skip to content

Add IPv6 support#109

Open
nightah wants to merge 1 commit intolancachenet:masterfrom
nightah:ipv6-support
Open

Add IPv6 support#109
nightah wants to merge 1 commit intolancachenet:masterfrom
nightah:ipv6-support

Conversation

@nightah
Copy link

@nightah nightah commented Oct 24, 2020

This is the first part in a set of changes to add IPv6 support.

Tasks Remaining:

  • Add IPv6 support to lancachenet/docker-compose
  • Update docs

@nightah
Copy link
Author

nightah commented Oct 27, 2020

@GotenXiao, @Crabbey and @VibroAxe I know we briefly spoke about this on Discord, it's probably worthwhile unifying this along with the other IPv6 PR's where relevant.

Should I rebase this and change the ENABLE_IPV6 switch to be called ENABLE_V6 like lancachenet/lancache-dns#112, or should we have @Crabbey change the aforementioned PR?

Just looking for direction so the changes I'm making both to the docs and lancachenet/docker-compose can be introduced seamlessly by way of merging the relevant PR's.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 15, 2021

This issue has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the inactive label Jan 15, 2021
@VibroAxe
Copy link
Member

Oops, forgot to flag this as an enhancement
We need a strategy about ipv6 @MathewBurnett and I were talking about this the other day.

The main issue is that ipv6 isn't the issue, it's the fact that the various tunnelling configs setup by the user tend to result in things missing the cache. Not really sure how we get round that until v6 in the house becomes more functional

@VibroAxe
Copy link
Member

We're also planning a large refactor to make generic depend on monolithic, not the other way round which will probably require some extensive modifications to this PR/moving it into monolithic

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Feb 24, 2025

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Feb 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants