test(e2e): add app search scenario#36118
Open
oooooowoooooo wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Adds an E2E scenario for searching an existing app by name from the apps console.
This PR adds:
e2e/features/apps/search-app.featuree2e/features/step-definitions/apps/search-app.steps.tsWhy
The apps E2E coverage already includes creation, duplication, deletion, export, publish, share, and mode-switching flows. This PR adds coverage for another common apps console path: filtering/searching an app by name.
This contributes to #34278.
Implementation
The scenario:
The test reuses the existing app setup flow and keeps the scope limited to one apps-console search scenario.
Validation
Local static check:
git diff --cached --checkResult: passed with no whitespace errors.
Full E2E suite was not run locally because this change was prepared from a sparse checkout focused on the
e2e/directory.