[12.x] Introducing Arr::hasAll

[devajmeireles]

Continuation of #55770, #26543

---

Previously, I made a new attempt to introduce hasAll due to frequent needs, but for the wrong target, Collections. Following PR #55770 I am now targeting the correct place, the Arr helper.

Example

use Illuminate\Support\Arr;

$array = ['name' => 'Taylor', 'language' => 'php'];

Arr::hasAll($array, ['name']); // ✅
Arr::hasAll($array, ['name', 'language']); // ✅
Arr::hasAll($array, ['name', 'ide']); // ❌, $array does not have all these keys

Although there are manual ways - PHP only, to achieve the same result without relying on the Arr helper, this brings benefits to framework users in favor of having a helper ready to use, without relying on framework macros or PHP codes written when necessary.

Behind the scenes, we ensure that we use the native has, so that dot notation is fully supported in it.

[martinbean]

@devajmeireles I might be missing something, but what does this do differently to just passing an array of keys as the second argument to the Arr::has method? As that already has the same functionality from what I can tell:

$data = [
    'foo' => 'foo',
];

// Will return false as $data does not have 'bar' key...
Illuminate\Support\Arr::has($data, ['foo', 'bar']);

I ask as I used Arr::has for this very purpose quite recently (checking a Stripe webhook event had multiple metadata keys I was expecting the payload to include).

[AhmedAlaa4611]

What is the difference between Arr::has and Arr::hasAll methods?