RFC: feat: add a blacklist of packages

[wszqkzqk]

• Don't build packages in the blacklist for various reasons

[000lbh]

some packages like pytorch and tensorflow have cuda dependency, and we shall modify their PKGBUILD or just block them

[wszqkzqk]

some packages like pytorch and tensorflow have cuda dependency, and we shall modify their PKGBUILD or just block them

They are classified as packages that cannot be built due to missing dependencies, and they themselves do not fall into the special reasons listed on the blacklist. So I prefer to not include them here.

[setarcos]

turbostat is not a pkgbase, it will be disabled by a patch for the linux-tools. I prefer only pkgbase(s) are listed here.

[wszqkzqk]

turbostat is not a pkgbase, it will be disabled by a patch for the linux-tools. I prefer only pkgbase(s) are listed here.

Agree.

[000lbh]

maybe we should also maintain a list of blocked packages(not only pkgbase), to avoid someone forgets to apply loong.patch and uploads those packages accidentally

[wszqkzqk]

maybe we should also maintain a list of blocked packages(not only pkgbase), to avoid someone forgets to apply loong.patch and uploads those packages accidentally

No, we use our own scripts to fetch pkgs and patches will always be applied. Otherwise, many packages even cannot be built successfully.

[wszqkzqk]

maybe we should also maintain a list of blocked packages(not only pkgbase), to avoid someone forgets to apply loong.patch and uploads those packages accidentally

If someone do forget this, he/she will probably forget this blacklist. 🤣👉