Skip to content

Conversation

@Kha
Copy link
Member

@Kha Kha commented Oct 17, 2025

No description provided.

@Kha Kha added the fast-ci Forces the use of large runners so that e.g. PR releases are created faster label Oct 17, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label Oct 17, 2025
@leanprover-community-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-community-bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase dc7c184ee287ed4ad8fd19165349965cd85d1977 --onto 4ce7ad19cea348506876685a19a7e0cca442c6d0. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2025-10-17 13:50:23)
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-10819 has successfully built against this PR. (2025-10-20 11:30:08) View Log

@leanprover-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-bot commented Oct 17, 2025

Reference manual CI status:

  • ❗ Reference manual CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-manual branch. Try git rebase dc7c184ee287ed4ad8fd19165349965cd85d1977 --onto d3dda9f6d4428a906c096067ecb75e432afc4615. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2025-10-17 13:50:24)
  • ❗ Reference manual CI can not be attempted yet, as the nightly-testing-2025-10-19 tag does not exist there yet. We will retry when you push more commits. If you rebase your branch onto nightly-with-manual, reference manual CI should run now. You can force reference manual CI using the force-manual-ci label. (2025-10-20 10:10:07)

@Kha Kha removed the fast-ci Forces the use of large runners so that e.g. PR releases are created faster label Oct 17, 2025
let blocked := (← get).diag.unfoldAxiomCounter.toList.filterMap fun (n, count) => do
let count := count - origDiag.unfoldAxiomCounter.findD n 0
guard <| count > 0 && getOriginalConstKind? env n matches some .defn
return m!"{.ofConstName n} ↦ {count}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This use of is a little confusing given it looks like fun f ↦ 1.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This style was established by diagnostics, though I'm open to discussion whether the number of occurrences is actually helpful here. @kmill I recall you had some opinion here.

Comment on lines +39 to +42
Note: The following definitions were not unfolded because their definition is not exposed:
f ↦ 1
⊢ f = 1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a little confusing; these two 1s are unrelated, right? Can you change one of them to 2 or 37?

leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4-nightly-testing that referenced this pull request Oct 20, 2025
@leanprover-community-bot leanprover-community-bot added the builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR label Oct 20, 2025
@Kha Kha enabled auto-merge October 21, 2025 08:10
@Kha Kha added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 21, 2025
Merged via the queue into leanprover:master with commit 37b78bd Oct 21, 2025
14 checks passed
@Kha Kha deleted the push-oquzqqsqltsk branch October 21, 2025 11:48
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Kha added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport releases/v4.25.0 builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants