Skip to content

feat: lemmas about list iterators #8384

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
datokrat merged 5 commits into from
May 23, 2025
Merged

feat: lemmas about list iterators #8384

datokrat merged 5 commits into from
May 23, 2025

Conversation

@datokrat
Copy link
Contributor

@datokrat datokrat commented May 16, 2025

This PR provides lemmas about the behavior of step, toArray, toList and toListRev on list iterators created with List.iter and List.iterM.

@datokrat datokrat added the changelog-library Library label May 16, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN label May 16, 2025
@leanprover-community-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

leanprover-community-bot commented May 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Mathlib CI status (docs):

  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 60ea92fdb0594065072ed843724d98cd15b76fba --onto ca9b3eb75f3f794d3d526a7c37da389175b317a2. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2025-05-16 15:23:59)
  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 60ea92fdb0594065072ed843724d98cd15b76fba --onto efe2ab4c04e81fe2a3edcc0d861449490b4431b2. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2025-05-20 09:03:27)
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-8384 has successfully built against this PR. (2025-05-20 14:31:11) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-8384 has successfully built against this PR. (2025-05-21 09:43:42) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-8384 has successfully built against this PR. (2025-05-21 11:03:51) View Log
  • ✅ Mathlib branch lean-pr-testing-8384 has successfully built against this PR. (2025-05-22 16:22:00) View Log
  • ❗ Batteries/Mathlib CI will not be attempted unless your PR branches off the nightly-with-mathlib branch. Try git rebase 44ff70020d4716f57afe82830cd0211a98417f38 --onto 4eccb5b4792c270ad10ac059b9672a8845961079. You can force Mathlib CI using the force-mathlib-ci label. (2025-05-23 08:16:43)

@datokrat datokrat force-pushed the paul/iterators/1-for-2 branch from 13f5672 to 5334da1 Compare May 20, 2025 08:27
@datokrat datokrat force-pushed the paul/iterators/2 branch 2 times, most recently from 4df3d9b to 881a874 Compare May 20, 2025 12:29
@datokrat datokrat force-pushed the paul/iterators/1-for-2 branch from 5334da1 to 9e0c59e Compare May 20, 2025 12:29
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Update lean-toolchain for testing leanprover/lean4#8384
ac9311b
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Update lean-toolchain for testing leanprover/lean4#8384
cf53b5a
@datokrat datokrat marked this pull request as ready for review May 20, 2025 13:19
@datokrat datokrat requested a review from TwoFX as a code owner May 20, 2025 13:19
@leanprover-community-bot leanprover-community-bot added the builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR label May 20, 2025
TwoFX
TwoFX reviewed May 21, 2025
View reviewed changes
TwoFX
TwoFX reviewed May 21, 2025
View reviewed changes
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Trigger CI for leanprover/lean4#8384
a0b3934
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Trigger CI for leanprover/lean4#8384
1bb59c2
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Trigger CI for leanprover/lean4#8384
bbc2c96
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request May 21, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Trigger CI for leanprover/lean4#8384
f61edf9
@datokrat datokrat force-pushed the paul/iterators/1-for-2 branch from 9e0c59e to 4eccb5b Compare May 22, 2025 15:09
@datokrat datokrat force-pushed the paul/iterators/2 branch from da69d44 to 3f1880b Compare May 22, 2025 15:09
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/batteries that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Trigger CI for leanprover/lean4#8384
8affd55
leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added a commit to leanprover-community/mathlib4 that referenced this pull request May 22, 2025
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot
Trigger CI for leanprover/lean4#8384
bd1fa12
@datokrat datokrat force-pushed the paul/iterators/2 branch from 3f1880b to ef5f884 Compare May 23, 2025 07:47
@datokrat datokrat changed the base branch from paul/iterators/1-for-2 to master May 23, 2025 09:29
@datokrat datokrat added this pull request to the merge queue May 23, 2025
Merged via the queue into master with commit 96b81f3 May 23, 2025
22 of 28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@TwoFX TwoFX TwoFX approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

builds-mathlib CI has verified that Mathlib builds against this PR changelog-library Library toolchain-available A toolchain is available for this PR, at leanprover/lean4-pr-releases:pr-release-NNNN

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@datokrat @leanprover-community-bot @TwoFX