-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 715
feat: associativity lemmas for BitVec.(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflow
#8740
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Mathlib CI status (docs):
|
(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflow(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflow
bollu
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. I wonder if it is worth naming the hypotheses as hxy and hyz for ease of use, or h₁, h₂.
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Siddharth <[email protected]>
javra
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
tobiasgrosser
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM.
|
changelog-library |
(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)OverflowBitVec.(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflow
…ow` (leanprover#8740) This PR introduces associativity rules and preservation of `(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflow`flags. --------- Co-authored-by: Siddharth <[email protected]>
…ow` (leanprover#8740) This PR introduces associativity rules and preservation of `(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflow`flags. --------- Co-authored-by: Siddharth <[email protected]>
This PR introduces associativity rules and preservation of
(umul, smul, uadd, sadd)Overflowflags.