Skip to content

Conversation

@omer-feinberg-island
Copy link
Contributor

and now from a branch!

@EladBezalel
Copy link
Collaborator

pushed to a brach, original PR - #37

@EladBezalel
Copy link
Collaborator

LGTM, waiting for tests and we'll merge :)

expect.stringMatching(
new RegExp(`^Found identifier .* in .*${changedFiles[0].filePath}$`)
)
`Added package proj2 to affected packages for changed line ${changedFiles[1].changedLines[0]} in ${changedFiles[1].filePath}`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@EladBezalel Could not write a viable test for my change without massively splitting the trueAffected func, so decided to go in a different direction: there was no test I could find ensuring we're not revisiting nodes, so I tweaked this one for the purpose. not exactly the same test, but as useful WDYT?

@EladBezalel EladBezalel merged commit cb82726 into lemonade-hq:main Apr 22, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants