Skip to content

Conversation

@mirooon
Copy link
Contributor

@mirooon mirooon commented Jul 8, 2025

Which Jira task belongs to this PR?

Why did I implement it this way?

Checklist before requesting a review

Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)

  • I have checked that any arbitrary calls to external contracts are validated and or restricted
  • I have checked that any privileged calls (i.e. storage modifications) are validated and or restricted
  • I have ensured that any new contracts have had AT A MINIMUM 1 preliminary audit conducted on by <company/auditor>

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 8, 2025

Walkthrough

A new Solidity contract named ContractThreeTest has been introduced. This contract implements the ILiFi interface and inherits from ReentrancyGuard, SwapperV2, and Validatable. It defines two external functions: swap for performing swaps and emitting an event, and deposit for handling token deposits.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol Added new contract ContractThreeTest with swap and deposit functions, interface implementation, and inheritance from multiple contracts.

Suggested labels

AuditNotRequired

Warning

Review ran into problems

🔥 Problems

Errors were encountered while retrieving linked issues.

Errors (1)
  • JIRA integration encountered authorization issues. Please disconnect and reconnect the integration in the CodeRabbit UI.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch olympix-test-test

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai auto-generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@lifi-action-bot lifi-action-bot marked this pull request as draft July 8, 2025 22:49
@lifi-action-bot lifi-action-bot changed the title Olympix test arg Olympix test arg [ContractThreeTest v1.0.0] Jul 8, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f648d3 and 26ceab7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`src/**/*.sol`: All Solidity files must start with: pragma solidity {version}. T...

src/**/*.sol: All Solidity files must start with: pragma solidity {version}. The Solidity version is defined in foundry.toml. Always refer to foundry.toml for the current version rather than storing duplicate information.
Validate constructor inputs rigorously: if an invalid value (e.g., address(0) or zero value) is provided, revert with a custom error such as InvalidConfig. Ensure tests cover these conditions.
Utilize reentrancy guards (e.g., OpenZeppelin’s ReentrancyGuard or the checks-effects-interactions pattern).
Optimize for gas efficiency with proper data structures and minimal state changes.
Separate logical sections of the contract with a single blank line (e.g., state variables, events, constructor, functions).
Add a single blank line between function declarations to improve readability. No blank lines between function signature and function body.
Use a single blank line before a new logical block (e.g., loop, condition, or function call), after setting up state variables at the beginning of a function, and before emitting an event for better visibility.
No unnecessary blank lines between if statements and their respective revert() calls, or before a return statement unless it's a separate logical block.
A single blank line between structs and enums, and between mappings and other declarations. Consecutive related mappings should be together without a blank line; logically different mappings should be separated by a blank line.
Place a single blank line between modifiers.
Do not add a blank line between events and errors.
Enforce the use of custom errors to save gas during error handling (gas-custom-errors).
Use keccak256 instead of the deprecated sha3 (avoid-sha3).
Disallow the use of selfdestruct (avoid-suicide).
Enforce the use of revert or require instead of throw (avoid-throw).
Prohibit reliance on tx.origin for authorization (avoid-tx-origin).
Require checking the return value of send to ensure transfers succeed (check-send-result).
Ensure contracts are compiled with a version matching ^0.8.17 (compiler-version).
Enforce explicit function visibility (excluding constructors) (func-visibility).
Discourage making multiple send calls within the same function (multiple-sends).
Prevent overly complex logic in fallback functions (no-complex-fallback).
Avoid using inline assembly to maintain code safety (no-inline-assembly).
Do not use blockhash for security-critical operations (not-rely-on-block-hash).
Avoid relying on block timestamps for critical logic (not-rely-on-time).
Enforce reentrancy protections on functions that make external calls (reentrancy).
Require explicit visibility for state variables (state-visibility).
Disallow reserved or ambiguous names (use-forbidden-name).
Enforce mixedCase naming for variables (var-name-mixedcase).
All import statements must be placed at the top of the file (imports-on-top).
Enforce the proper order of visibility modifiers (visibility-modifier-order).
Immutable variables should be named in uppercase (like constants) (immutable-vars-naming).
Function names must follow mixedCase notation (func-name-mixedcase).
Event names must use CapWords style (event-name-capwords).
Contract names must be in CapWords style (contract-name-capwords).
Constant names must use snake_case (const-name-snakecase).
Enforce the use of double quotes for string literals (quotes).

📄 Source: CodeRabbit Inference Engine (conventions.md)

List of files the instruction was applied to:

  • src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol
🧠 Learnings (2)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: mirooon
PR: lifinance/contracts#1187
File: .github/workflows/versionControlAndAuditCheck.yml:596-612
Timestamp: 2025-06-05T11:25:43.443Z
Learning: The user mirooon has an internal system for tracking tickets and technical debt. They acknowledged the security concern about disabled commit hash verification in the audit workflow and plan to implement conditional logic to skip verification only for revert PRs in a future update.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#1237
File: conventions.md:56-60
Timestamp: 2025-07-03T01:44:43.968Z
Learning: Always consult the conventions.md file for the latest rules and conventions when reviewing PRs or code changes in the lifinance/contracts repository. Make suggestions when code changes do not match the documented conventions in this file.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#1256
File: deployments/zksync.diamond.json:81-87
Timestamp: 2025-07-04T08:59:08.083Z
Learning: When analyzing deployment PRs in the lifinance/contracts repository, carefully verify that target state configuration files (like script/deploy/_targetState.json) have been updated before flagging missing entries. The AI summary section should be consulted to understand all file changes, as manual searches might miss entries due to formatting differences or search limitations.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#1208
File: test/solidity/utils/TestAMM.sol:18-22
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T08:47:22.079Z
Learning: For test contracts in the lifinance/contracts repository, simpler error handling approaches are acceptable and preferred over more complex error bubbling mechanisms, as the focus is on functionality rather than detailed error reporting.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to src/Facets/*Facet.sol : Facet contracts typically inherit from ILiFi, LibAsset, LibSwap, LibAllowList, ReentrancyGuard, SwapperV2, Validatable, and may use ECDSA.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#819
File: deployments/bsc.json:48-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-04T09:00:06.744Z
Learning: The `LiFiDEXAggregator` contract does not include a `swapAndCompare` function.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#819
File: deployments/bsc.json:48-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T03:47:21.269Z
Learning: The `LiFiDEXAggregator` contract does not include a `swapAndCompare` function.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#832
File: src/Periphery/LiFiDEXAggregator.sol:578-697
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T02:05:41.355Z
Learning: Unit tests are not required for newly added swap callback functions in `LiFiDEXAggregator.sol`.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.t.sol : Verify that the expected events (e.g., AssetSwapped or LiFiTransferStarted) are emitted with the intended parameters in tests.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#782
File: test/solidity/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.t.sol:22-35
Timestamp: 2024-10-10T03:18:20.721Z
Learning: In Solidity tests for withdrawal functions in `test/solidity/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.t.sol`, do not suggest adding tests where the withdrawal amount exceeds the contract's balance, as such tests are unnecessary because any contract will fail in that case.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#831
File: src/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.sol:26-30
Timestamp: 2024-10-14T08:23:38.076Z
Learning: In the `WithdrawablePeriphery.sol` contract, when transferring Ether in the `withdrawToken` function, prefer using `SafeTransferLib.safeTransferETH` instead of low-level `call` for safer Ether transfers.
Learnt from: mirooon
PR: lifinance/contracts#945
File: test/solidity/Facets/GlacisFacet.t.sol:214-262
Timestamp: 2025-01-22T12:36:12.699Z
Learning: In the LiFi contracts, token pair validation is handled by third-party contracts, and route discovery including liquidity checks are performed off-chain. The contract only receives pre-validated routes, making token pair and liquidity validation tests unnecessary at the contract level.
Learnt from: ezynda3
PR: lifinance/contracts#1116
File: src/Libraries/LibAsset.sol:102-108
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T07:46:24.084Z
Learning: In the LiFi contracts, the `LibAsset.transferFromERC20` function is intentionally designed to accept arbitrary `from` parameters, with security ensured through a whitelist mechanism that controls which contracts can call this function.
src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol (12)
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#832
File: src/Periphery/LiFiDEXAggregator.sol:578-697
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T02:05:41.355Z
Learning: Unit tests are not required for newly added swap callback functions in `LiFiDEXAggregator.sol`.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to src/Facets/*Facet.sol : Facet contracts typically inherit from ILiFi, LibAsset, LibSwap, LibAllowList, ReentrancyGuard, SwapperV2, Validatable, and may use ECDSA.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#819
File: deployments/bsc.json:48-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T03:47:21.269Z
Learning: The `LiFiDEXAggregator` contract does not include a `swapAndCompare` function.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#819
File: deployments/bsc.json:48-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-04T09:00:06.744Z
Learning: The `LiFiDEXAggregator` contract does not include a `swapAndCompare` function.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.t.sol : Verify that the expected events (e.g., AssetSwapped or LiFiTransferStarted) are emitted with the intended parameters in tests.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#782
File: test/solidity/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.t.sol:22-35
Timestamp: 2024-10-10T03:18:20.721Z
Learning: In Solidity tests for withdrawal functions in `test/solidity/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.t.sol`, do not suggest adding tests where the withdrawal amount exceeds the contract's balance, as such tests are unnecessary because any contract will fail in that case.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to src/Facets/*Facet.sol : Facets must always include the following three functions: _startBridge (internal), swapAndStartBridgeTokensVia{FacetName}, and startBridgeTokensVia{FacetName}.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.t.sol : Any contract that inherits from TestBase.sol must call initTestBase() in setUp() and set facet address.
Learnt from: mirooon
PR: lifinance/contracts#1117
File: test/solidity/Periphery/LiFiDEXAggregator.t.sol:111-127
Timestamp: 2025-05-06T09:09:38.108Z
Learning: The `setupApechain()` function in LiFiDEXAggregator tests intentionally avoids calling `initTestBase()` to prevent needing to define standard contracts (like ADDRESS_USDC_PROXY and Uniswap) that aren't needed for Apechain-specific tests.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#782
File: deployments/worldchain.diamond.json:40-43
Timestamp: 2024-11-26T01:16:27.721Z
Learning: Version inconsistencies of 'GenericSwapFacetV3' across deployment configurations are acceptable if they are only due to differences in Solidity pragma directives.
Learnt from: ezynda3
PR: lifinance/contracts#1116
File: src/Libraries/LibAsset.sol:102-108
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T07:46:24.084Z
Learning: In the LiFi contracts, the `LibAsset.transferFromERC20` function is intentionally designed to accept arbitrary `from` parameters, with security ensured through a whitelist mechanism that controls which contracts can call this function.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#1208
File: test/solidity/utils/TestAMM.sol:18-22
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T08:47:22.079Z
Learning: For test contracts in the lifinance/contracts repository, simpler error handling approaches are acceptable and preferred over more complex error bubbling mechanisms, as the focus is on functionality rather than detailed error reporting.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
  • GitHub Check: audit-verification
  • GitHub Check: Static Analysis Security Check
  • GitHub Check: run-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: enforce-min-test-coverage
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (javascript-typescript)
  • GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
  • GitHub Check: generate-tag
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol (4)

1-2: LGTM - Proper license and pragma version.

The SPDX license identifier and Solidity pragma version are correct and follow the coding guidelines.


4-9: LGTM - Standard imports for LiFi contract.

The imports are properly structured and include the necessary interfaces and libraries for LiFi functionality.


11-13: LGTM - Contract declaration follows conventions.

The contract name uses CapWords style and includes proper version annotation. The inheritance structure is appropriate for a LiFi contract.


11-26: Consider adding comprehensive test coverage for this contract.

Since this is a test contract, ensure that proper unit tests are created to verify:

  • The swap function correctly handles bridge data validation
  • Event emission with correct parameters
  • Deposit function behavior with various token types
  • Error handling for invalid inputs
  • Reentrancy protection effectiveness

Would you like me to help generate comprehensive unit tests for this contract?

⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.t.sol : Verify that the expected events (e.g., AssetSwapped or LiFiTransferStarted) are emitted with the intended parameters in tests.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#832
File: src/Periphery/LiFiDEXAggregator.sol:578-697
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T02:05:41.355Z
Learning: Unit tests are not required for newly added swap callback functions in `LiFiDEXAggregator.sol`.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#782
File: test/solidity/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.t.sol:22-35
Timestamp: 2024-10-10T03:18:20.721Z
Learning: In Solidity tests for withdrawal functions in `test/solidity/Helpers/WithdrawablePeriphery.t.sol`, do not suggest adding tests where the withdrawal amount exceeds the contract's balance, as such tests are unnecessary because any contract will fail in that case.
Learnt from: mirooon
PR: lifinance/contracts#945
File: test/solidity/Facets/GlacisFacet.t.sol:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-01-28T11:29:09.566Z
Learning: Empty test methods with explanatory comments are acceptable in test classes when the feature being tested (e.g., native token bridging) is not supported by the implementation.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to src/Facets/*Facet.sol : Facets must always include the following three functions: _startBridge (internal), swapAndStartBridgeTokensVia{FacetName}, and startBridgeTokensVia{FacetName}.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#807
File: test/solidity/Facets/GasZipFacet.t.sol:212-213
Timestamp: 2024-10-22T03:16:28.754Z
Learning: In the `GasZipFacetTest`, for the test case `testBase_Revert_SwapAndBridgeWithInvalidSwapData()`, a generic revert is expected, so `vm.expectRevert();` without specifying the expected error is appropriate.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.t.sol : Before executing a function call that should emit an event, always use vm.expectEmit(true, true, true, true, <contractAddress>) to ensure the event parameters match and that the event is emitted by the correct contract.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.t.sol : Include comments where necessary to explain the purpose of tests or to clarify non-obvious behavior.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to src/Facets/*Facet.sol : After a swap, verify if facet-specific parameters (e.g., expected outputAmount) require adjustment based on the actual swap outcome.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#1208
File: test/solidity/utils/TestAMM.sol:18-22
Timestamp: 2025-06-15T08:47:22.079Z
Learning: For test contracts in the lifinance/contracts repository, simpler error handling approaches are acceptable and preferred over more complex error bubbling mechanisms, as the focus is on functionality rather than detailed error reporting.
Learnt from: CR
PR: lifinance/contracts#0
File: conventions.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-06-30T10:00:42.770Z
Learning: Applies to src/Facets/*Facet.sol : Facet contracts typically inherit from ILiFi, LibAsset, LibSwap, LibAllowList, ReentrancyGuard, SwapperV2, Validatable, and may use ECDSA.
Learnt from: mirooon
PR: lifinance/contracts#945
File: test/solidity/Facets/GlacisFacet.t.sol:214-262
Timestamp: 2025-01-22T12:36:12.699Z
Learning: The GlacisFacet test suite inherits from TestBaseFacet which already covers various failure scenarios including invalid receiver address, invalid amounts, same chain bridging, and insufficient funds, making additional failure scenario tests redundant.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#819
File: deployments/bsc.json:48-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-04T09:00:06.744Z
Learning: The `LiFiDEXAggregator` contract does not include a `swapAndCompare` function.
Learnt from: 0xDEnYO
PR: lifinance/contracts#819
File: deployments/bsc.json:48-48
Timestamp: 2024-10-09T03:47:21.269Z
Learning: The `LiFiDEXAggregator` contract does not include a `swapAndCompare` function.
Learnt from: ezynda3
PR: lifinance/contracts#1116
File: src/Libraries/LibAsset.sol:102-108
Timestamp: 2025-04-28T07:46:24.084Z
Learning: In the LiFi contracts, the `LibAsset.transferFromERC20` function is intentionally designed to accept arbitrary `from` parameters, with security ensured through a whitelist mechanism that controls which contracts can call this function.

Comment on lines +23 to +25
function deposit(address token, uint256 amount) external {
LibAsset.depositAsset(token, amount);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add input validation and access control to deposit function.

The deposit function lacks basic input validation and access control mechanisms. It should validate the token address and amount parameters, and potentially include reentrancy protection.

-    function deposit(address token, uint256 amount) external {
+    function deposit(address token, uint256 amount) external nonReentrant {
+        if (token == address(0)) revert InvalidConfig();
+        if (amount == 0) revert InvalidConfig();
         LibAsset.depositAsset(token, amount);
     }

You'll need to define the InvalidConfig error if not already available in inherited contracts.

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol around lines 23 to 25, the deposit function
lacks input validation and access control. Add checks to ensure the token
address is not zero and the amount is greater than zero. Implement access
control to restrict who can call this function, such as using a modifier like
onlyOwner or similar. Include reentrancy protection by using a nonReentrant
modifier if available. Also, define the InvalidConfig error if it is not already
defined in the contract or inherited contracts to handle invalid input cases.

Comment on lines +14 to +21
function swap(
ILiFi.BridgeData memory _bridgeData,
LibSwap.SwapData calldata _swapData
) external payable nonReentrant validateBridgeData(_bridgeData) {
LibSwap.swap(0, _swapData);

emit LiFiTransferStarted(_bridgeData);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix hardcoded transactionId in LibSwap.swap call.

The LibSwap.swap function is called with a hardcoded transactionId of 0, which could cause issues with transaction tracking and event correlation. The transactionId should typically be derived from the bridge data or be properly generated.

-        LibSwap.swap(0, _swapData);
+        LibSwap.swap(_bridgeData.transactionId, _swapData);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function swap(
ILiFi.BridgeData memory _bridgeData,
LibSwap.SwapData calldata _swapData
) external payable nonReentrant validateBridgeData(_bridgeData) {
LibSwap.swap(0, _swapData);
emit LiFiTransferStarted(_bridgeData);
}
function swap(
ILiFi.BridgeData memory _bridgeData,
LibSwap.SwapData calldata _swapData
) external payable nonReentrant validateBridgeData(_bridgeData) {
- LibSwap.swap(0, _swapData);
+ LibSwap.swap(_bridgeData.transactionId, _swapData);
emit LiFiTransferStarted(_bridgeData);
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In src/Test/ContractThreeTest.sol around lines 14 to 21, the call to
LibSwap.swap uses a hardcoded transactionId of 0, which can cause issues with
tracking. Modify the code to pass a proper transactionId derived from the
_bridgeData parameter or generate a unique transactionId instead of using 0,
ensuring correct transaction identification and event correlation.

@lifi-action-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Test Coverage Report

Line Coverage: 84.05% (2240 / 2665 lines)
Function Coverage: 88.39% ( 381 / 431 functions)
Branch Coverage: 56.08% ( 304 / 542 branches)
Test coverage (84.05%) is above min threshold (83%). Check passed.

@mirooon mirooon marked this pull request as ready for review July 8, 2025 22:54
@lifi-action-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

🤖 GitHub Action: Security Alerts Review 🔍

No unresolved security alerts! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants