Tie element with owner lifecycle instead of insert/delete queue #39
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is just an experiment.
Deleting the element when the owner disposes would make the current queue logic unnecessary, and also allow for removing elements from the tree, keeping in memory and then re-adding again without deleting the element in the process. Which make using
Suspense
,createRootPool
and other primitives that keep elements in memory possible.Currently this breaks
onDestroy
animations, because ofnode.parent = undefined
inremoveNode
. It is necessary for elements kept in memory to not be displayed, but it also mean that all elements removed are removed immediately without animations.