-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
walletrpc: document that min conf_target is 2 #9611
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
walletrpc: document that min conf_target is 2 #9611
Conversation
Without this notice a developer might think that 1 is a valid value, which can result in a rare bug. Example: lightninglabs/loop#898
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think this is correct? I think all implementations allow a conf target of 1, this is also used in the sweeper.
For web API,
lnd/lnwallet/chainfee/estimator.go
Lines 804 to 809 in de1ed93
if numBlocks > MaxBlockTarget { | |
numBlocks = MaxBlockTarget | |
} else if numBlocks < minBlockTarget { | |
return 0, fmt.Errorf("conf target of %v is too low, minimum "+ | |
"accepted is %v", numBlocks, minBlockTarget) | |
} |
For bitcoind it's allowed, not sure the RPC resp returned from btcd
tho.
What error did you get?
@starius, remember to re-request review from reviewers when ready |
Change Description
Without this notice a developer might think that 1 is a valid value, which can result in a rare bug.
Example: lightninglabs/loop#898
Pull Request Checklist
Testing
Code Style and Documentation
[skip ci]
in the commit message for small changes.📝 Please see our Contribution Guidelines for further guidance.