-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
routerrpc: reject payment to invoice that don't have payment secret or blinded paths #9752
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
routerrpc: reject payment to invoice that don't have payment secret or blinded paths #9752
Conversation
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are limited to specific labels. 🏷️ Labels to auto review (1)
Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
ada4d4e
to
69e180c
Compare
670fca4
to
b37fe55
Compare
b37fe55
to
bb59d52
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hello @erickcestari, could you please split the commit into two? One for the code changes and another for the documentation. Thanks!
bb59d52
to
50cc265
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @erickcestari , consider adding a test case to TestExtractIntentFromSendRequest
in router_backend_test.go
to cover this scenario.
50cc265
to
6e7034a
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That’s all from my side.
6e7034a
to
2395167
Compare
…r blinded paths Ensure that a payment is only sent if the invoice includes either a payment address (payment secret) or at least one blinded path.
2395167
to
51b1059
Compare
Hello @saubyk it would be nice to have the CI Workflow running for this PR. |
This PR introduces the initial phase of enforcing payment secret validation for invoices, as described in issue #9718.
Change Description
Adds validation to
extractIntentFromSendRequest
to ensure that an invoice includes either a payment address (payment secret) or at least one blinded path when parsing the SendRequest details.Related to: #9700, #9718