Conversation
Conflicts: CHANGES.txt
python/buildout.cfg
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This looks really unstable. Why do we need to remove the files in the first place? And why can't we match python* here?
|
For me, this fails with: which is curious, since both my system Python and the adhocracy Python have zlib installed. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be /bin/sh - the file is not dependent on bash at all, or is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This should be /bin/sh - the file is not dependent on bash at all, or is it?
its not working with sh.
|
When I install multiple times (just run |
|
@phihag: Can you try to run |
python/buildout.cfg
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We should also pass in the -f and -T options here, since we're symlinking a directory. In fact, is that the rationale for the rms above? If so, just adding -fT and removing the rms will suffice.
|
With the changes, uwsgi starts and serves the correct page, but still mentions This looks like one of the options we set isn't actually boolean. |
buildouts/uwsgi.cfg
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are these two entries used anywhere? It seems like we're simply using {main:port} (as we should)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How is this related to uwsgi?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This debug flag does not work with mutliprocess WSGI-servers such as uwsgi
Its better to use the domains/ports parts only for server hosts/ports settings and the adhocracy part for adhocracy configuration: * adhocracy.host is now domains.wsgi * port.main is now ports.wsgi * domains.main is no adhocracy.domain
touch-reload = true is throws: "unable to stat() true, events will be triggered as soon as the file is created"
fixed |
bin/uwsgi sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH now |
allow to extent the "LD_LIBRARY_PATH" |
|
ah :) |
|
Testet build.sh with Debian 7.1 netboot image, OK |
no, the recipe minitage.recipe.du was the reason, fixed. |
Can you try again or give me an VM to investigate this? |
|
@phihag do you still have problems? |
#444