Skip to content

[CI] Assign label based on Conventional Commits #2839

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
adamjensenbot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024
Merged

[CI] Assign label based on Conventional Commits #2839

adamjensenbot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 20, 2024

Conversation

@cheina97
Copy link
Member

@cheina97 cheina97 commented Dec 3, 2024

Description

This PR adds an action to assign labels automatically based on conventional commits

@adamjensenbot
Copy link
Collaborator

adamjensenbot commented Dec 3, 2024

Hi @cheina97. Thanks for your PR!

I am @adamjensenbot.
You can interact with me issuing a slash command in the first line of a comment.
Currently, I understand the following commands:

  • /rebase: Rebase this PR onto the master branch (You can add the option test=true to launch the tests
    when the rebase operation is completed)
  • /merge: Merge this PR into the master branch
  • /build Build Liqo components
  • /test Launch the E2E and Unit tests
  • /hold, /unhold Add/remove the hold label to prevent merging with /merge

Make sure this PR appears in the liqo changelog, adding one of the following labels:

  • kind/breaking: 💥 Breaking Change
  • kind/feature: 🚀 New Feature
  • kind/bug: 🐛 Bug Fix
  • kind/cleanup: 🧹 Code Refactoring
  • kind/docs: 📝 Documentation

@cheina97 cheina97 marked this pull request as draft December 3, 2024 16:05
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/S and removed size/XS labels Dec 3, 2024
@cheina97 cheina97 force-pushed the frc/abelaction branch 3 times, most recently from 3146454 to 86e513b Compare December 3, 2024 16:25
@pull-request-size pull-request-size bot added size/M and removed size/S labels Dec 3, 2024
@cheina97 cheina97 force-pushed the frc/abelaction branch 5 times, most recently from c55b09e to 44538ed Compare December 3, 2024 16:52
@cheina97 cheina97 added chore Miscellaneous tasks that don't modify application logic (e.g., updating dependencies or build tasks) size/M and removed size/M chore Miscellaneous tasks that don't modify application logic (e.g., updating dependencies or build tasks) labels Dec 3, 2024
@fra98
Copy link
Member

fra98 commented Dec 4, 2024

/hold waiting for RC3 and depends on #2834

@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot added the hold Prevent bot merging label Dec 4, 2024
@cheina97 cheina97 force-pushed the frc/abelaction branch 9 times, most recently from 28e49ee to 7de7197 Compare December 18, 2024 12:35
@cheina97 cheina97 marked this pull request as ready for review December 18, 2024 12:53
@cheina97 cheina97 added hold Prevent bot merging and removed hold Prevent bot merging labels Dec 18, 2024
@cheina97 cheina97 changed the title [CI] Assign label based on conventional commits [CI] Assign label based on Conventional Commits Dec 18, 2024
@fra98
Copy link
Member

fra98 commented Dec 20, 2024

/rebase test=true

@fra98
Copy link
Member

fra98 commented Dec 20, 2024

/unhold

@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot removed the hold Prevent bot merging label Dec 20, 2024
@fra98
Copy link
Member

fra98 commented Dec 20, 2024

/merge

@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot added the merge-requested Request bot merging (automatically managed) label Dec 20, 2024
@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot merged commit 7c70835 into liqotech:master Dec 20, 2024
13 checks passed
@adamjensenbot adamjensenbot removed the merge-requested Request bot merging (automatically managed) label Dec 20, 2024
@cheina97 cheina97 deleted the frc/abelaction branch March 5, 2025 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@fra98 fra98 fra98 approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

size/M

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@cheina97 @adamjensenbot @fra98