Skip to content

fix: uniquify respects init method override #462

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2025
Merged

fix: uniquify respects init method override #462

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 27, 2025

Conversation

cofin
Copy link
Member

@cofin cofin commented Apr 27, 2025

Passing uniquify as an __init__ argument now works as expected.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 27, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.14%. Comparing base (0ec0ec3) to head (d64749e).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #462   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.14%   88.14%           
=======================================
  Files          84       84           
  Lines        5507     5508    +1     
  Branches      679      677    -2     
=======================================
+ Hits         4854     4855    +1     
  Misses        445      445           
  Partials      208      208           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link

Documentation preview will be available shortly at https://litestar-org.github.io/advanced-alchemy-docs-preview/462

@cofin cofin force-pushed the uniquify-setting branch from 07eb0a5 to d64749e Compare April 27, 2025 23:30
@cofin cofin merged commit 6dfcb43 into main Apr 27, 2025
12 checks passed
@cofin cofin deleted the uniquify-setting branch April 27, 2025 23:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants