This project implements the Tigo TAP protocol, especially for the purpose of monitoring a Tigo TAP and the associated solar array using the TAP's communication cable. This allows 100% local offline data collection.
The TAP protocol is described at docs/protocol.md.
This system uses two networks, a wired "gateway network" and a wireless "PV network":
Gateway PV device
device (TAP) (optimizer)
┌─────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
PV ┌─▶│ Application │ │ Application │ Proprietary
network │ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤ │
│ │ Network │ │ Network │ │
│ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤
│ │ Link │ │ Link │ 802.15.4
│ ├─────────────────┤ ├─────────────────┤ │
│ │ Physical │ │ Physical │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
│ ▲ ▲
│ └ ─ ─ ─ ─ ┘
│ ┌─────────────────┐
Gateway └─▶│ Transport │ Proprietary
network ├─────────────────┤ │
│ Link │ │
├─────────────────┤
│ Physical │ RS-485
└─────────────────┘
The gateway network runs over RS-485 and can support more than two connections. An owner may therefore connect a USB RS-485 adapter, or an RS-485 hat, or any other RS-485 interface without interrupting communication.
The gateway network supports a single controller. Most owners use a Tigo Cloud Connect Advanced (CCA), but there are
alternatives, including older Tigo products and similar controllers embedded in GoodWe inverters. taptap can observe
the controller's communication, without ever transmitting anything; as far as the other components are concerned, it
does not exist. This allows owners to gather real-time information from their own hardware without going through Tigo's
cloud platform and without modifying the controller, their TAPs, or any other hardware in any way.
Placement considerations
This system uses a 4-wire bus: ground (– or ⏚), power (+), A, and B. These wires are intended to run from the controller to a TAP, and possibly to another TAP, and so on. The A and B wires carry RS-485 signals. Tigo recommends putting a 120Ω resistor on the last TAP's A and B wires to terminate the far end of the bus, and they built a 120Ω resistor into the controller to terminate the near end of the bus.
If you are adding a monitoring device to an existing install, it would be best to move the controller's A and B wires to the monitoring device, and then to run new wires from there to the controller. Having said that, it should be fine to connect short wires from the controller's A and B terminals to the monitoring device, especially if you plan never to transmit. (Your monitoring device may also have a "ground" or "reference" terminal, which should go to the controller's gateway ⏚ ground.) In either case, make sure the RS-485 interface you're adding does not include a third termination resistor. The bus should always be terminated at the controller and at the furthest away TAP.
┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────────┐
│ CCA │ │ TAP │
│ │ │ │
│ AUX RS485-1 GATEWAY RS485-2 POWER│ │ ┌~┐ │
│┌─┬─┐ ┌─┬─┬─┐ ┌─┬─┬─┬─┐ ┌─┬─┬─┐ ┌─┬─┐│ │ ┌─┬─┬─┬─┐ ┌─┬─┬│┬│┐ │
││/│_│ │-│B│A│ │-│+│B│A│ │-│B│A│ │-│+││ │ │-│+│B│A│ │-│+│B│A│ │
│└─┴─┘ └─┴─┴─┘ └│┴│┴│┴│┘ └─┴─┴─┘ └─┴─┘│ │ └│┴│┴│┴│┘ └─┴─┴─┴─┘ │
└───────────────│─│─│─│───────────────┘ └────│─│─│─│─────────────────┘
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ │ ┃───────────────────────────│─│─│─┘
│ │ ┃─┃───────────────────────────│─│─┘
│ └─┃─┃───────────────────────────│─┘
┃───┃─┃───────────────────────────┘
┗━┓ ┃ ┃
┌───┃─┃─┃───┐
│ ┌┃┬┃┬┃┐ │
│ │-│B│A│ │
│ └─┴─┴─┘ │
│ Monitor │
└───────────┘
Future work: controller-less operation
In the absence of another controller, taptap could request PV packets from the gateway(s) itself. The
gateway and PV modules appear to function autonomously after configuration, so for a fully commissioned system,
receiving PV packets from the gateway without ever transmitting anything to the modules would likely be sufficient for
monitoring.
Software-based connection method for owners with root access on their controller
Some owners have root access on their controller. These owners could install
tcpserial_hook on their controller to make the
serial data available over the LAN, including to taptap, without physically adding another RS-485
interface.
This method has several disadvantages: it requires root access, it requires (reversibly) modifying the
files on the controller, it might stop working in future firmware updates, it only works when the controller is working,
etc. It is a fast way to get started for some users, but consider wiring in a separate RS-485 interface instead.
taptap consists of a library and an executable. The executable is a CLI:
% taptap
Usage: taptap <COMMAND> <OPTION>
Commands:
list-serial-ports List the serial ports available on this system
observe Observe the system, extracting data as it runs
peek-bytes Peek at the raw data flowing at the gateway physical layer
peek-frames Peek at the assembled frames at the gateway link layer
peek-activity Peek at the gateway transport and PV application layer activity
help Print this message or the help of the given subcommand(s)
Options:
--serial <SERIAL-PORT> The name of the serial port (try `taptap list-serial-ports`) of the Modbus-to-serial device (mutually exclusive to --tcp)
--tcp <DESTINATION> The IP or hostname of the device which is providing Modbus-over-TCP service
--port <PORT NUMBER> If --tcp is specified, the port to which to connect [default: 502]
--reconnect-timeout <SECONDS> The time after which connection is re-established if no data is received in seconds (0 for no timeout) [default: 0]
--reconnect-retry <INT> The number of times to retry reconnecting before giving up (0 for infinite retries) [default: 0]
--reconnect-delay <SECONDS> The delay between reconnect attempts in seconds [default: 5]
--state-file <FILE> Path of the JSON file to provide persistent storage for the infrastructure topology data
-h, --help Print help
-V, --version Print versionMost useful for PV panels monitoring is observe subcommand. As of this version, the observe emits taptap::observer::Events to standard output:
% taptap observe --tcp 172.21.3.44
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":116,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:16:41.686961-05:00","voltage_in":30.6,"voltage_out":30.2,"current":6.94,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":1.0,"temperature":26.8,"rssi":132}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":116,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:17:01.691683-05:00","voltage_in":30.75,"voltage_out":30.4,"current":6.895,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":1.0,"temperature":26.8,"rssi":132}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":82,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:16:41.686961-05:00","voltage_in":30.55,"voltage_out":30.2,"current":6.845,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":1.0,"temperature":29.3,"rssi":147}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":82,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:17:01.691683-05:00","voltage_in":30.95,"voltage_out":30.6,"current":6.765,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":1.0,"temperature":29.3,"rssi":147}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":19,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:16:41.686961-05:00","voltage_in":30.35,"voltage_out":29.9,"current":6.865,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":1.0,"temperature":28.7,"rssi":147}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":19,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:17:01.691683-05:00","voltage_in":29.85,"voltage_out":29.4,"current":7.005,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":1.0,"temperature":28.7,"rssi":147}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":121,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:16:41.686961-05:00","voltage_in":29.8,"voltage_out":21.9,"current":5.25,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":0.7607843137254902,"temperature":29.8,"rssi":120}
{"event_type": "power_report", "gateway": 4609,"node":121,"timestamp":"2024-08-24T09:17:01.691683-05:00","voltage_in":30.55,"voltage_out":22.8,"current":5.3,"dc_dc_duty_cycle":0.7725490196078432,"temperature":29.8,"rssi":120}
Also when frames with gateways or nodes identification are received taptap::observer::PersistentStateReport is emitted to tha standard output, including gateways and nodes addresses, versions and barcodes (values are redacted in the sample bellow):
% taptap observe --tcp 172.21.3.44
{"event_type":"infrastructure_report",
gateways":{"4609":{"address":"04:C0:5B:30:ZZ:ZZ:ZZ:ZZ","version":"Mgate Version UUUUUUUUUUU\r"},"4610":{"address":"04:C0:5B:30:ZZ:ZZ:ZZ:ZZ","version":""}},"nodes":{"4609":{"2":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"3":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"4":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"5":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"6":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"7":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"8":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"9":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"11":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"12":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"13":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"14":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"15":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"16":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"17":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"},"18":{"address":"04:C0:5B:40:XX:XX:XX:XX","barcode":"4-YYYYYYY"}}}}
As such gateway and nodes identification frames are transmitted rarely (in my experience those are not transmitted during PV panels operation during daytime, but rather after sundown when controller probably starts to execute some housekeeping actions), this version now supports storing infrastructure data in the JSON file, which is used as persistent store, ensuring that such data are not lost during restarts. At taptap start the JSON file is read and taptap::observer::PersistentStateReport is immediately emitted from the latest stored state. JSON file is updated immediately after any update message is received. To use persistent function you need to provide runtime argument passing JSON file path (example):
taptap observe --tcp 172.21.3.44 --state-file ./taptap.json
This version doesn't support and probably never will any messages parsing, corelation or direct database sink to store emitted messages. I like 'KISS' (Keep It Stupid, Simple) principles and I strongly prefer to have simple atomic tool to output Tigo CCA messages and than use more suitable programs for messages parsing, corelation and storing in some backend storage. Take a look into Logstash, FluentD, of if you looking for MQTT bridge you can checkout my taptap-mqqt project