add: cmakelist

[Anton-Fat]

No description provided.

[geky-bot]

Tests passed ✓, Code: 17112 B (+0.0%), Stack: 1448 B (+0.0%), Structs: 812 B (+0.0%)

	Code	Stack	Structs		Coverage
Default	17112 B (+0.0%)	1448 B (+0.0%)	812 B (+0.0%)	Lines	2435/2595 lines (-0.0%)
Readonly	6230 B (+0.0%)	448 B (+0.0%)	812 B (+0.0%)	Branches	1283/1616 branches (+0.0%)
Threadsafe	17964 B (+0.0%)	1448 B (+0.0%)	820 B (+0.0%)		Benchmarks
Multiversion	17184 B (+0.0%)	1448 B (+0.0%)	816 B (+0.0%)	Readed	29369693876 B (+0.0%)
Migrate	18776 B (+0.0%)	1752 B (+0.0%)	816 B (+0.0%)	Proged	1482874766 B (+0.0%)
Error-asserts	17924 B (+0.0%)	1440 B (+0.0%)	812 B (+0.0%)	Erased	1568888832 B (+0.0%)

[BenBE]

Не могли бы вы написать комментарии в коде на английском? Так они будут полезны гораздо более широкой аудитории.

[bmcdonnell-fb]

This PR relates to #857. We had some discussion there about whether or not it's a desirable to include this in the repo.

I did just a quick skim review here.

Also I agree with @BenBE that (if this gets merged) it's preferable to have comments in English.

[bmcdonnell-fb]

Why are these here? Seems undesirable.

[geky]

I think the best path for cmake support at the moment would be if someone volunteered to host/maintain a CMakeLists.txt outside of this org.

We could add a link to it in the README.md (and eventually website) to direct potential users, like we have with littlefs-python, littlefs2-rust, etc.

If such a CMakeLists.txt matures, and there's interest, I can eventually bring it into this org as an "official(?)" repo and volunteer to maintain it. But 1. I don't think it's high-priority, and 2. I'm not yet convinced there's a single CMakeLists.txt that covers enough use cases to be worth the maintenance headache.