Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CIR][LibOpt] Extend std::find optimization to all calls with raw pointers #400

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

philnik777
Copy link
Contributor

@philnik777 philnik777 commented Jan 14, 2024

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from memchr is null and changes the result to last in that case.

Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is pretty cool, thanks for improving it! Mostly good, few extra comments.

@lanza lanza force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from 4e069c6 to 79d4dc7 Compare January 29, 2024 23:34
lanza and others added 5 commits January 31, 2024 12:25
This reverts commit ecde0fa75f5b55e28d3b0b449d3cb30fe1432328.
This is super verbose, but I'm leaving around the old style code here to
make it clear that this behavior is implemented during lowering.
Copy link
Member

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bcardosolopes bcardosolopes merged commit 4449a78 into llvm:main Feb 2, 2024
6 checks passed
@philnik777 philnik777 deleted the extend_find_libopt branch February 20, 2024 00:46
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 23, 2024
…nters (#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
eZWALT pushed a commit to eZWALT/clangir that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2024
…nters (llvm#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…nters (#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…nters (#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
eZWALT pushed a commit to eZWALT/clangir that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…nters (llvm#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2024
…nters (#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
bruteforceboy pushed a commit to bruteforceboy/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
…nters (llvm#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
Hugobros3 pushed a commit to shady-gang/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 2, 2024
…nters (llvm#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
keryell pushed a commit to keryell/clangir that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2024
…nters (llvm#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
lanza pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 5, 2024
…nters (#400)

This also adds a missing check whether the pointer returned from
`memchr` is null and changes the result to `last` in that case.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants