Skip to content

Conversation

@tvanbeek
Copy link

For more info see discussion here: #9

@tvanbeek
Copy link
Author

@eliotjordan @jpstroop

@jpstroop
Copy link
Member

@tvanbeek I'm not sure how actively this is maintained anymore. @eliotjordan @bcail @alexwlchan ?

@alexwlchan
Copy link

I'm still around and using Loris – and I’ve seen @bcail merging patches too. Are you talking about this Docker image as unmaintained?

A lot of this looks to be copied from core Loris, I wonder if it’d be worth rethinking it more than patching this one issue? I can have a dig into this properly soon, possibly after Christmas.

@tvanbeek
Copy link
Author

@tvanbeek I'm not sure how actively this is maintained anymore. @eliotjordan @bcail @alexwlchan ?

Whats the best alternative in your opinion? Other then this little thing, which took some time to figure out, its pretty easy to set up.

@jpstroop
Copy link
Member

My apologies, yes I'm talking specifically about this Docker image

@bcail
Copy link
Contributor

bcail commented Dec 19, 2019

I agree with @alexwlchan - that's a lot of code copied over from Loris core, and therefore missing any improvements that are made there. I would suggest updating the docker image to not have its own copy of webapp.py.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants