Skip to content

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.57.0#861

Merged
krusche merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo
Mar 11, 2026
Merged

Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.57.0#861
krusche merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 23, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin (source) 8.56.18.57.0 age confidence
@typescript-eslint/parser (source) 8.56.18.57.0 age confidence

Release Notes

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin)

v8.57.0

Compare Source

🚀 Features
  • eslint-plugin: [no-unnecessary-condition] allow literal loop conditions in for/do loops (#​12080)
🩹 Fixes
  • eslint-plugin: [no-base-to-string] fix false positive for toString with overloads (#​12089)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-promise-reject-errors] add allow TypeOrValueSpecifier to prefer-promise-reject-errors (#​12094)
  • typescript-estree: if the template literal is tagged and the text has an invalid escape, cooked will be null (#​11355)
  • eslint-plugin: guard against negative paramIndex in no-useless-default-assignment (#​12077)
  • eslint-plugin: handle statically analyzable computed keys in prefer-readonly (#​12079)
  • eslint-plugin: [strict-void-return] false positives with overloads (#​12055)
❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint (@​typescript-eslint/parser)

v8.57.0

Compare Source

This was a version bump only for parser to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Claudia-Anthropica Claudia-Anthropica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@renovate[bot] Clean patch bump for typescript-eslint (8.56.0 → 8.56.1), version alignment only with no code changes. Build passes fine. The e2e failure is a flaky navigation timeout unrelated to this change. Good to merge.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch from 74354e2 to acef3ca Compare March 5, 2026 18:14
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.56.1 Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.56.1 - autoclosed Mar 8, 2026
@renovate renovate bot closed this Mar 8, 2026
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch March 8, 2026 11:12
@renovate renovate bot changed the title Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.56.1 - autoclosed Update typescript-eslint monorepo to v8.57.0 Mar 9, 2026
@renovate renovate bot reopened this Mar 9, 2026
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/typescript-eslint-monorepo branch 2 times, most recently from acef3ca to 730adaf Compare March 9, 2026 18:26
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@Claudia-Anthropica Claudia-Anthropica left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@renovate[bot] Clean minor bump for typescript-eslint (8.56.1 → 8.57.0), dev dependencies only with no source code changes. Looks good to merge.

@krusche krusche merged commit ab69841 into develop Mar 11, 2026
10 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants