Development: Rework admin views icons and detail view

[sachmii]

Checklist

General

• I tested all changes and their related features with all corresponding user types.
• Language: I followed the guidelines for inclusive, diversity-sensitive, and appreciative language.
• I chose a title conforming to the naming conventions for pull requests.

Client

• I strictly followed the client coding and design guidelines.
• I added multiple integration tests (Jest) related to the features (with a high test coverage), while following the test guidelines.
• I added multiple screenshots/screencasts of my UI changes.

Motivation and Context

Closes #1740.

Description

• Consolidated Research Group admin actions into an Actions menu; View remains a separate button
• Approve/Deny/Withdraw now open confirm dialogs from the Actions menu
  Added menu wiring with guards for missing researchGroup.id

Steps for Testing

Prerequisites:

1. Log in to TumApply Admin
2. Check departments and research group view
3. Check create-buttons and different icons

Review Progress

Code Review

• Code Review 1

Manual Tests

• Test 1

Test Coverage

Warning: Client tests failed. Coverage could not be fully measured. Please check the workflow logs.

Last updated: 2026-01-21 14:14:03 UTC

Screenshots

[github-actions]

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

[github-actions]

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

[github-actions]

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

[github-actions]

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

[CelineLahnor]

That you for implementing this. I tested it on the test server and the Research Group Detail View is not looking as expected. Please have a look on that

[Bofan-Zhu]

That you for implementing this. I tested it on the test server and the Research Group Detail View is not looking as expected. Please have a look on that

I think you forgot to pull for me it looks like this

[Bofan-Zhu]

Small thing I noticed, the manage members page is empty (looks broken) if there are no members, should we adjust this? Just add a text that there are no members? (Can be done in another PR)

Rest lgtm

[CelineLahnor]

That you for implementing this. I tested it on the test server and the Research Group Detail View is not looking as expected. Please have a look on that

I think you forgot to pull for me it looks like this

Yeah I realized I was at the wrong PR branch. I checked it again and its working fine

[sachmii]

Small thing I noticed, the manage members page is empty (looks broken) if there are no members, should we adjust this? Just add a text that there are no members? (Can be done in another PR) Rest lgtm

Will do this in a follow up, thx for testing

[github-actions]

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

[Kiara65]

LGTM, thank you 😄

[Abi107717]

Tested locally LGTM, thank you