Skip to content

Development: Rework user data export server side #1755

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
sachmii wants to merge 26 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Development: Rework user data export server side #1755

sachmii wants to merge 26 commits into from

Conversation

@sachmii
Copy link
Contributor

@sachmii sachmii commented Jan 20, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Checklist

General

Server

  • Important: I implemented the changes with a very good performance and prevented too many (unnecessary) and too complex database calls.
  • I strictly followed the principle of data economy for all database calls.
  • I strictly followed the server coding and design guidelines.
  • I documented the Java code using JavaDoc style.

Motivation and Context

Description

Steps for Testing

Prerequisites:

  1. Log in to TumApply

  2. Export User data (wait few seconds)

  3. Check exported data corresponds with uploaded documents, applications etc.

  4. Run integration tests

Review Progress

Code Review

  • Code Review 1

Manual Tests

  • Test 1

Test Coverage

@sachmii sachmii self-assigned this Jan 20, 2026
@sachmii sachmii linked an issue Jan 20, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
Rework user data export (server side) #1750
Open
@github-actions github-actions bot added server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) client Pull requests that update TypeScript code. (Added Automatically!) tests labels Jan 20, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 20, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@sachmii
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/ls1intum/tum-apply into fea…
77694cf 
…t/1750-rework-user-data-export-server-side
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🤖 OpenAPI spec and client code auto-updated and committed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Client Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

npm run test:ci
open build/test-results/lcov-report/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-client" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Server Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
open build/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-server" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Server Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
open build/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-server" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🤖 OpenAPI spec and client code auto-updated and committed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Server Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
open build/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-server" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Client Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

npm run test:ci
open build/test-results/lcov-report/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-client" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Server Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
open build/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-server" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📊 Client Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

npm run test:ci
open build/test-results/lcov-report/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-client" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

📊 Server Test Coverage Too Low

🔍 View coverage locally:

./gradlew test jacocoTestReport
open build/reports/jacoco/test/html/index.html

🌐 View coverage from GitHub:
Download the "coverage-report-server" artifact from this workflow run.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

@sachmii Test coverage could not be fully measured because some tests failed. Please check the workflow logs for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jan 22, 2026

🤖 No OpenAPI or client changes needed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@az108 az108 Awaiting requested review from az108 az108 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review az108 is a code owner

Assignees

@sachmii sachmii

Labels

client Pull requests that update TypeScript code. (Added Automatically!) config-change database server Pull requests that update Java code. (Added Automatically!) tests

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Rework user data export (server side)

2 participants

@sachmii