Skip to content

DM-54386: use on_exposure_record for visit definition, bump stack#79

Open
atanikan wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
tickets/DM-54386
Open

DM-54386: use on_exposure_record for visit definition, bump stack#79
atanikan wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
tickets/DM-54386

Conversation

@atanikan
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@atanikan atanikan commented Apr 1, 2026

  • Wire RawIngestTask.on_exposure_record to DefineVisitsTask.run([record]) per ctrl_oods/butlerAttendant (avoids per-detector define-visits batches).
  • Remove post-batch visit_definer loop over success_refs.
  • Default OBS_LSST_VERSION to w_2026_13 (DM-54297/DM-53882); align manual workflow default.

@atanikan atanikan requested review from dhirving and ktlim April 1, 2026 04:20
@atanikan atanikan force-pushed the tickets/DM-54386 branch 3 times, most recently from 787db23 to b54f649 Compare April 1, 2026 04:35
- Wire RawIngestTask.on_exposure_record to DefineVisitsTask.run([record])
  per ctrl_oods/butlerAttendant (avoids per-detector define-visits batches).
- Remove post-batch visit_definer loop over success_refs.
- Default OBS_LSST_VERSION to w_2026_13 (DM-54297/DM-53882); align manual
  workflow default.
@atanikan atanikan requested a review from wyang007 April 1, 2026 16:30
@dhirving dhirving requested review from srp3rd and removed request for dhirving April 2, 2026 16:59
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@srp3rd srp3rd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks fine; didn't realize that you could have nested def's like that, callable outside the scope of the initial definition. TIL

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants