Skip to content

Document the preferred Luanti release schedule #228

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

SmallJoker
Copy link
Member

This is the PR version for #225.
To properly document the process, I found that rewriting the "feature freeze" section helps to convey the intend of releasing more often (skip over PRs that would otherwise stall the release).

Feel free to provide suggestions.

@SmallJoker SmallJoker force-pushed the pr_228_document_release_schedule branch from f422a6a to 5951916 Compare May 4, 2025 07:28
@@ -8,6 +8,15 @@ aliases:

# Releasing Luanti

The [feature freeze](#feature-freeze) and release date is set by core developers.

Historically, the Minetest release intervals were in between half and an entire year. To deliver bugfixes and features more quickly, the goal is to release more often.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
Historically, the Minetest release intervals were in between half and an entire year. To deliver bugfixes and features more quickly, the goal is to release more often.
Historically, the Luanti release intervals were in between half and an entire year. To deliver bugfixes and features more quickly, the goal is to release more often.

we want to call it Luanti, even if it was called Minetest back then, to minimize confusion. can also do "Luanti (then Minetest)" if you think this is important.

Copy link
Member Author

@SmallJoker SmallJoker May 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might Minetest/Luanti be okay too? I explicitly used this notation because it predates the whole rename action. I wonder whether Luanti (then Minetest) is generally understood - as I am not a native English speaker.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants