tftp: bind to TFTP port only when in server mode #61
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The TFTP app should not bind to the TFTP server port when configured as a client. Instead, the local port should be chosen from the dynamic range (49152 ~ 65535) so that if the application is stopped and started again, the remote server will not consider the new packets as part of the same context (which would cause an error since a new RRQ would be unexpected). Signed-off-by: Jerome Forissier <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The TFTP app should not bind to the TFTP server port when configured as a client. Instead, the local port should be chosen from the dynamic range (49152 ~ 65535) so that if the application is stopped and started again, the remote server will not consider the new packets as part of the same context (which would cause an error since a new RRQ would be unexpected).
Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas [email protected]