Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update login.py #5739

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: preview
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

codecloudsintern
Copy link

@codecloudsintern codecloudsintern commented Oct 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Streamlined login process for improved user experience.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted session management to enhance reliability post-login.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 2, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 2, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve modifications to the user_login function within the apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/login.py file. The implementation has been streamlined by simplifying the call to the login function and adjusting the structure for clarity. While the conditional logic for session expiry based on the is_admin flag remains, the session management approach has been altered, including the removal of certain lines related to session saving.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/login.py Modified user_login function: simplified login call, adjusted formatting of device_info, removed session save and return statement.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Server
    User->>Server: Initiates login
    Server->>Server: Process login
    Server->>Server: Check is_admin flag
    Server->>Server: Construct device_info
    Server->>User: Login response
Loading

🐇 "In the code where rabbits hop,
The login's smooth, it won't stop.
With simpler calls and clearer ways,
We celebrate these joyful days!
No more clutter, just a breeze,
Hopping through with utmost ease!" 🐇


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/login.py (2)

9-13: LGTM: Login call simplified and admin session handling maintained.

The login call has been correctly simplified, and the admin session expiry setting is appropriately handled.

Consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of the custom admin session expiry:

# Set a custom session expiry for admin users
if is_admin:
    request.session.set_expiry(settings.ADMIN_SESSION_COOKIE_AGE)

24-28: Remove unnecessary empty lines and consider adding a comment.

The device_info is correctly stored in the session. However, there are a couple of minor issues:

  1. There are unnecessary empty lines at the end of the function.
  2. The function ends without an explicit return statement, which might be confusing to some developers.

Please apply the following changes:

     }
 request.session["device_info"] = device_info
-
-   
-    
+    # No explicit return needed for login functions

This change removes the empty lines and adds a comment explaining why there's no return statement, improving code readability.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62c45f3 and d37391e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/login.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/login.py (2)

1-8: LGTM: Imports and function signature are appropriate.

The imports and function signature are well-structured and maintain backward compatibility. The use of Django's login function and settings, along with the custom base_host function, aligns with the function's requirements.


15-24: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix indentation and review base_host function call.

The device_info dictionary construction is correct, but there are some issues to address:

  1. The indentation is inconsistent. Ensure all lines are aligned properly.
  2. The base_host function is called with all boolean flags from user_login. It's worth reviewing if all these parameters are necessary.

Please apply the following changes:

 device_info = { 
     "user_agent": request.META.get("HTTP_USER_AGENT",""),
     "ip_address": request.META.get("REMOTE_ADDR", ""),
     "domain": base_host(
-            request=request,
-            is_app=is_app,
-            is_admin=is_admin,
-            is_space=is_space,
-            ), 
+        request=request,
+        is_app=is_app,
+        is_admin=is_admin,
+        is_space=is_space,
+    ), 
 }

To ensure the base_host function actually uses all these parameters, run the following script:

✅ Verification successful

All concerns addressed successfully.

  • Verified that all parameters (is_admin, is_space, is_app) passed to the base_host function are utilized appropriately.
  • Confirmed that the indentation issues have been fixed as per the suggested diff.
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of parameters in the base_host function

# Test: Search for the base_host function definition and its usage
rg --type python -A 10 'def base_host'

Length of output: 71


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of parameters in the base_host function

# Test: Search for the base_host function definition and its usage
rg --type=py -A 10 'def base_host'

Length of output: 1866


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of parameters in the base_host function within authentication utils

# Search for usage of is_admin in base_host
rg --type=py 'is_admin' apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/host.py

# Search for usage of is_space in base_host
rg --type=py 'is_space' apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/host.py

# Search for usage of is_app in base_host
rg --type=py 'is_app' apiserver/plane/authentication/utils/host.py

Length of output: 463

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants