Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WEB-2306] chore: IssueParentDetail added to issue peekoverview #5751

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: preview
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anmolsinghbhatia
Copy link
Collaborator

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia commented Oct 4, 2024

Changes:

This PR enhances the issue peek overview by adding IssueParentDetail to the peek view.

Reference:

[WEB-2306]

Media:

Before After
before after

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced a new IssueParentDetail component for enhanced issue visibility when an issue has a parent.
  • Bug Fixes

    • No reported bugs addressed in this release.
  • Documentation

    • Updated component structure to include the new IssueParentDetail.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a new component called IssueParentDetail within the PeekOverviewIssueDetails component. This new component is conditionally rendered based on the presence of a parent_id in the issue object. The IssueParentDetail receives several props, including workspaceSlug, projectId, issueId, issue, and issueOperations. Import statements for the new component are also included, while the existing functionality and structure of PeekOverviewIssueDetails remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx Added IssueParentDetail component with conditional rendering based on parent_id. Updated import statements accordingly.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

🎨UI / UX

Suggested reviewers

  • sriramveeraghanta
  • SatishGandham

Poem

🐇 In the garden where issues bloom,
A parent detail finds its room.
Conditional grace, it hops in sight,
Enhancing views with pure delight.
With props in tow, it takes its place,
A joyful change in our code's embrace! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@anmolsinghbhatia anmolsinghbhatia marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2024 09:16
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2)

60-68: LGTM: IssueParentDetail added correctly.

The IssueParentDetail component is appropriately conditionally rendered based on the existence of issue.parent_id. All necessary props are passed correctly, and the placement within the render output is logical.

Consider destructuring the issue object to pass only the required properties to IssueParentDetail, improving readability and potentially performance. For example:

 <IssueParentDetail
   workspaceSlug={workspaceSlug}
   projectId={issue.project_id}
   issueId={issueId}
-  issue={issue}
+  parentId={issue.parent_id}
   issueOperations={issueOperations}
 />

This assumes that IssueParentDetail only needs parentId from the issue object. Adjust accordingly if more properties are required.


Issue Detected: IssueParentDetail Component Not Found

The IssueParentDetail component referenced in your changes does not appear to exist in the codebase. Please verify its implementation or ensure it has been correctly added in this PR.

🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-100: Summary: Changes align well with PR objectives.

The implementation successfully adds the IssueParentDetail component to the issue peek overview, as intended in the PR objectives. The changes are minimal, focused, and do not appear to negatively impact existing functionality. The conditional rendering ensures that the new component is only displayed when relevant (i.e., when an issue has a parent).

To ensure that the IssueParentDetail component is implemented correctly, let's verify its existence and basic structure:

This script will help confirm that the IssueParentDetail component exists and has a basic functional component structure, supporting the changes made in this PR.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation of IssueParentDetail component

# Test 1: Check if IssueParentDetail component exists
echo "Checking for IssueParentDetail component:"
fd --type f --extension tsx --extension ts IssueParentDetail

# Test 2: Verify basic structure of IssueParentDetail component
echo "\nVerifying basic structure of IssueParentDetail component:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const IssueParentDetail: FC<$_> = ($_) => {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 384

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ec22f1f and f285991.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
web/core/components/issues/peek-overview/issue-detail.tsx (1)

4-4: LGTM: Import statement updated correctly.

The import statement has been properly updated to include the IssueParentDetail component, which is consistent with its usage in the component's render logic.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants