Skip to content

Conversation

@CommanderStorm
Copy link
Member

@CommanderStorm CommanderStorm commented Nov 29, 2025

our style spec currently has two ways of naming the accompanying docs. This fixes this.

The code changed is only ever used to generate docs.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 93.70%. Comparing base (d933a0c) to head (44713bf).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1390   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   93.70%   93.70%           
=======================================
  Files         111      111           
  Lines        4387     4387           
  Branches     1389     1389           
=======================================
  Hits         4111     4111           
  Misses        276      276           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Size Change: 0 B

Total Size: 134 kB

ℹ️ View Unchanged
Filename Size
dist/index.cjs 67.5 kB
dist/index.mjs 66.4 kB

compressed-size-action

@CommanderStorm CommanderStorm enabled auto-merge (squash) November 29, 2025 17:30
@HarelM
Copy link
Collaborator

HarelM commented Nov 29, 2025

I think maputnik uses that to add an info button for every filled, but I think it uses "doc" only.

@HarelM
Copy link
Collaborator

HarelM commented Nov 29, 2025

Ahh, this is the expression parameters docs, it's pretty new, so that might be the reason for the misalignment.
I don't think maputnik is using it.

@CommanderStorm CommanderStorm merged commit 481d82f into main Nov 29, 2025
7 checks passed
@CommanderStorm CommanderStorm deleted the consistent-docs branch November 29, 2025 18:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants