Gpu data

[Sam-Mear]

Gpu data, not ready to be merged yet, just opening as its close.

[Sam-Mear]

Just noticed VRAM capacity is not shown, and seems to be conflicting with Maximum VRAM Capacity

[Sam-Mear]

Just noticed VRAM capacity is not shown, and seems to be conflicting with Maximum VRAM Capacity

nvm it is shown... but should be noted they should probably be MT/s rather than Mhz.

[Sam-Mear]

Hi, I think this is pretty go to go into beta now, let me know if you see anything wrong with it so far @markasoftware

[markasoftware]

Sorry for the late response! Overall looks really good, I'm fine to merge it basically whatever since it's already a huge improvement over what we have right now. That being said there are still a few things that could be improved:

• On most pages we want to display parts from "most high end" to "least high end", but that seems to typically not be the case in your pr; for example under maxwell 2.0 nvidia we have the gtx 750 first, then 950, then 960, etc, so the opposite order.
• "uncategorized Graphics Cards" should be capitalized to "Uncategorized"
• A lot of the categories still say 14nm lithography when it isn't true, eg under 3dfx, powervr, xgi, all the old nvidia
• Somehow the row comparison thinks "N/A" Vulkan support is better than actually having vulkan support lol, see the vulkan row on https://deploy-preview-86--specdb.netlify.app/Radeon-RX-5600-OEM,Radeon-RX-5600-XT,Radeon-RX-5700-XT-50th-Anniversary,Tesla-C870 and how the "N/A" is highlighted red

[Sam-Mear]

I think this should be good to go for now. Can always fix things with later pull requests

[markasoftware]

Nice! Some notes:

• Even with these thousands of new parts, the compressed bundle.js that has to be loaded over the network is <250 KiB when compressed.
• The text around the bracket for "Hardware Accelerated Media" is a bit broken because the label is too long so it goes onto a second line that collides with the bracket. I can probably look into this in the CSS.
• Very happy to see the "matcher" architecture keeps working and a lot of the new GPUs have benchmark data!
• Some of the benchmark numbers for newer GPUs have a lot of digits, I should do something to add commas to make them more readable
• In some generations, eg GCN 2 and 3, the ordering of the GPUs within each section is not in order from best->worst.
• TDPs on some cards says "unknown", I'd prefer if it were just blank

I'd also prefer if the scraping code was open-sourced somewhere, even if it's just random python scripts in a separate repo that you control.

This is a massive achievement and certainly the biggest update to SpecDB since its inception!

[Sam-Mear]

@markasoftware I did edit some of the matcher stuff, and added another one I think. If you see any obvious ones without a benchmark I'll have a look but any of the new ish graphics cards should have them