Develop - #6972
Conversation
Marfo0
commented
Aug 3, 2026
- DEMO LINK
- TEST REPORT LINK
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
The implementation is functionally correct with all tests passing, but there's a critical checklist violation: all CSS styles are in a single style.css file when the checklist explicitly requires each BEM block to have its own separate file (e.g., stars.css for the stars block). This is a structural requirement that must be addressed. Additionally, the CSS selectors for active stars have repetitive .stars__star:nth-child blocks that could be consolidated using a combined selector pattern to reduce code duplication.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
| /* add styles here */ | ||
| body { | ||
| margin: 0; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .stars { | ||
| display: flex; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .stars__star { | ||
| width: 16px; | ||
| height: 16px; | ||
| margin-right: 4px; | ||
|
|
||
| background-image: url(images/star.svg); | ||
| background-repeat: no-repeat; | ||
| background-position: center; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| .stars--1 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 1), | ||
| .stars--2 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 2), | ||
| .stars--3 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 3), | ||
| .stars--4 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 4), | ||
| .stars--5 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 5) { | ||
| background-image: url(images/star-active.svg); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Checklist violation: 'Each BEM block has its own separate file'. The CSS has all styles in a single style.css file. According to BEM methodology and the checklist requirements, each BEM block should have its own separate file (e.g., stars.css for the stars block).
|
|
||
| .stars--1 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 1), | ||
| .stars--2 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 2), | ||
| .stars--3 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 3), | ||
| .stars--4 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 4), | ||
| .stars--5 .stars__star:nth-child(-n + 5) { | ||
| background-image: url(images/star-active.svg); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The CSS selectors for active stars could be consolidated using a combined selector pattern. Currently each modifier has its own selector block which creates repetition. Consider using a shared selector to reduce code duplication.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
All functional requirements are met: CSS is properly split into separate files, the 6 stars blocks with modifiers (stars--0 through stars--5) work correctly, flexbox layout is implemented without the gap property, and the combined selector pattern properly activates the correct number of stars using background-image. The implementation correctly follows BEM naming conventions with each block in its own file. One minor note: in src/index.html, the second stylesheet link has inconsistent relative path formatting compared to the first—consider using href="./stars.css" to match the style of href="./style.css". However, this is purely cosmetic and doesn't affect functionality.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
| <link | ||
| rel="stylesheet" | ||
| href="stars.css" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The href should use consistent relative path with ./ prefix like the previous link: href="./stars.css"