Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great work on this task! I am approving your solution as you've successfully written tests that cover all the core requirements for the restoreNames function.
To make your test suite even more robust in the future, here are a couple of suggestions you could consider:
- Add a test case for an array containing multiple user objects, including a mix of users that need their names restored and those that don't.
- Test edge cases, such as passing an empty array
[]to the function, to ensure it handles them gracefully.
Also, I noticed a small thing: there's an unused import in src/restoreNames.test.js that can be removed for cleaner code. Excellent job overall!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
src/restoreNames.test.js
Outdated
| @@ -1,10 +1,48 @@ | |||
| 'use strict'; | |||
|
|
|||
| const { ExportConflictException } = require('@aws-sdk/client-dynamodb'); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This import seems to be unused in this test file. It's good practice to remove any unnecessary dependencies or leftover code.
src/restoreNames.test.js
Outdated
| expect(users[0].firstName).toBe('Jack') | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| // write tests here |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The current tests are good for individual cases. To make the test suite more comprehensive, consider adding a test for an array containing multiple user objects, some that need fixing and some that don't. Testing edge cases, like an empty array, would also be a valuable addition.
2 participants
No description provided.