Add Neo, Nio and Tensor clients to ecosystem/clients

[dannycolin]

Description

Add new clients to ecosystem/clients

Related issues

#3152
#3147
#3146
#3140

Role

Participant to the Matrix Hackathon 2026

Timeline

No timeline

Signoff

Please sign off your individual commits or whole pull request.

[HarHarLinks]

For mactrix, please consider the discussion at #3176 :)

[dannycolin]

For mactrix, please consider the discussion at #3176 :)

Lets simply remove it for now. We can add it later when the maintainer reply to your message.

[awtj8o81ryywg793]

It's nice to see that the website is receiving some love through this year's hackathon!

In regard to the following files, do we have any licence information (as per #2706):

• content/ecosystem/clients/neo.webp
• content/ecosystem/clients/nio.png
• content/ecosystem/clients/tensor.png

[dannycolin]

In regard to the following files, do we have any licence information (as per #2706):
* content/ecosystem/clients/neo.webp

No information. see commit.

* `content/ecosystem/clients/nio.png`

There's https://github.com/niochat/nio/blob/stable/Resources/AppIcon/attribution.txt in the Resources folder. However, it doesn't say to which icons it applies. Plus, there are many "chat" icons in the Noun Project. see commit.

* `content/ecosystem/clients/tensor.png`

Nothing mentioned. see commit.

[HarHarLinks]

@dannycolin are you still planning on addressing the feedback or should we take this over?

[dannycolin]

@dannycolin are you still planning on addressing the feedback or should we take this over?

I can update it. I wasn't sure if it was still worth based on the discussion we had that we need a better solution to classify clients.

[HarHarLinks]

I would welcome contributions to finding better classifications but in the meantime continue with the currently established pattern and not block on this.

[dannycolin]

What should we do for the client icons if there's no license information? See #3183 (comment)

[awtj8o81ryywg793]

Quoted from a previous comment:

What should we do for the client icons if there's no license information? See #3183 (comment)

Good question. I asked the author (@davidar) to shed some light on this issue back in January 2026 (see this comment), and I haven't received a response as of writing this comment. I wonder if we should simply exclude content that isn't explicitly licensed. Any thoughts?

[HarHarLinks]

simply exclude content that isn't explicitly licensed.

I had the same thought. If we don't have the license to use something then obviously we cannot use it. Reaching out to authors is already going the extra mile.

Given these are all obsolete, I wouldn't expect too much of a reaction either, nor is it quite as relevant as a supported client as obsoletes will be hidden by default.

[awtj8o81ryywg793]

Quoted from a previous comment:

I had the same thought. If we don't have the license to use something then obviously we cannot use it. Reaching out to authors is already going the extra mile.

Upon review, (unless I'm missing something) we cannot use the Tensor or Neo logos because each project is licensed under GPL‑3.0. As for Nio, the logo’s licence is unclear, so let’s play it safe and exclude it as well.

[awtj8o81ryywg793]

@dannycolin: Do you plan to take action regarding the recent feedback? If not, we can take this on.

[dannycolin]

@dannycolin: Do you plan to take action regarding the recent feedback? If not, we can take this on.

I kinda lost track so feel feel to take it if you want.