Skip to content

Add ComponentsKit#1865

Closed
mikhailChelbaev wants to merge 1 commit into
matteocrippa:masterfrom
componentskit:master
Closed

Add ComponentsKit#1865
mikhailChelbaev wants to merge 1 commit into
matteocrippa:masterfrom
componentskit:master

Conversation

@mikhailChelbaev
Copy link
Copy Markdown

  • Project Name: ComponentsKit
  • Project URL: https://github.com/componentskit/ComponentsKit
  • Project Description: A collection of reusable and fully customizable SwiftUI & UIKit components.
  • Why it should be added to awesome-swift: The library provides components that can be used to speed up app development
  • At least 15 stars (GitHub project)
  • Support Swift 5
  • Updated contents.json instead of README
  • Lib is fully open sourced, written in Swift and not a wrapper over compiled lib
  • Description does not say "written in Swift" or variant 🤓

@matteocrippa matteocrippa requested a review from Copilot July 6, 2025 19:55
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

Adds a new entry for the ComponentsKit library to the contents.json list of Swift UI components.

  • Inserts a comma after the previous item to enable adding a new entry.
  • Adds a JSON object with title, category, description, homepage, and tags for ComponentsKit.

Comment thread contents.json
"tags":["swift", "codable"]
},
{
"title": "ComponentsKit",
Copy link

Copilot AI Jul 6, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The new entry 'ComponentsKit' should be inserted in alphabetical order within the ui category so the list remains sorted.

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
@componentskit componentskit closed this by deleting the head repository Oct 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants