Allow components to store any datatype

[memorycode]

This PR adds support for non-table components. Calling Components.Model(model) will return a table that has a special marker on it that tells the World it should be unwrapped on insertion. I explicitly chose this strategy because it means that we can do not need to store this table in archetypes.

Unfortunately, we still need to store Components.Model(model) initially inside of a table because we need a way to get the component ID and Luau does not have tuples.

[LastTalon]

I haven't had time to read the full changes yet. I have gotten to some of the central changes though.

[LastTalon]

Could you also update the description of the PR with a brief description of how this PR achieves what it says in the title in case anyone looks back at it later?

[memorycode]

Could you also update the description of the PR with a brief description of how this PR achieves what it says in the title in case anyone looks back at it later?

Updated the description.

[memorycode]

@LastTalon, I started updating the docs but I'm still not sure what to call everything. As it stands, the docs for Component say that it returns a ComponentInstance, but this is not true anymore.

[LastTalon]

but this is not true anymore.

How so? It seems to me like it does.

[memorycode]

but this is not true anymore.

How so? It seems to me like it does.

Well, it can return a ComponentInstance, if we want to consider that a ComponentInstance. But I don't think we should consider it a ComponentInstance because we don't want people interacting with it in the same way they interact with table components.

[LastTalon]

This doesn't seem complicated to me. We clearly just have two types of component instance now. What else would have you it return?

It seems to me it returns a ComponentInstance still. It's just that that type is now a union of TableComponentInstance | ValueComponentInstance.

[memorycode]

This doesn't seem complicated to me. We clearly just have two types of component instance now. What else would have you it return?

It seems to me it returns a ComponentInstance still. It's just that that type is now a union of TableComponentInstance | ValueComponentInstance.

Just updated the docs to what I believe they could potentially look like. Curious if this is what you had in mind.