Skip to content

Conversation

@Deniallugo
Copy link
Contributor

What ❔

Disabling sanity checks for commitment generation

Why ❔

Our external node is designed around commitment generation and verification. Now it's possible to be in a situation, that we have incorrect block and we can't revert it, because we don't have a commitment for it.

EN is not able to produce any commitment => EN can't verify the commitment => EN can't revert incorrect block.

Is this a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Operational changes

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zkstack dev fmt and zkstack dev lint.

@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-disable-sanity-checks-for-en branch 2 times, most recently from 8be1abc to 06dd12e Compare September 15, 2025 14:02
@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-disable-sanity-checks-for-en branch from 06dd12e to e188f24 Compare September 15, 2025 14:09
@Deniallugo Deniallugo added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 15, 2025
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Sep 15, 2025
@Deniallugo Deniallugo added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 17, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 7692f31 Sep 17, 2025
66 of 68 checks passed
@Deniallugo Deniallugo deleted the deniallugo-disable-sanity-checks-for-en branch September 17, 2025 08:13
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[29.3.0](core-v29.2.0...core-v29.3.0)
(2025-09-18)


### Features

* **en:** Check commitment allonside with roothashes
([#4492](#4492))
([6e8f526](6e8f526))
* **en:** Improved en commitment generation error handling
([#4483](#4483))
([1bb82d6](1bb82d6))


### Bug Fixes

* **en:** Add check for commitment in diverged batch
([#4493](#4493))
([e693fd0](e693fd0))
* **en:** allow to disable sanity checks for commitment generation
([#4487](#4487))
([7692f31](7692f31))
* **EN:** properly set chain_id for old batch transactions
([#4488](#4488))
([634b6dd](634b6dd))
* **eth-proof-manager:** don't fail component if proof was incorrect
([#4444](#4444))
([daa1161](daa1161))
* **eth-proof-manager:** verify protocol version and proving mode
alignment
([#4473](#4473))
([99e0423](99e0423))
* **eth-sender:** Fix selector for old batches
([#4489](#4489))
([bb42dcf](bb42dcf))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
Deniallugo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
)

## What ❔

Disabling sanity checks for commitment generation


## Why ❔

Our external node is designed around commitment generation and
verification. Now it's possible to be in a situation, that we have
incorrect block and we can't revert it, because we don't have a
commitment for it.

EN is not able to produce any commitment => EN can't verify the
commitment => EN can't revert incorrect block.


## Is this a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No

## Operational changes
<!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? -->
<!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own
ZK Chain may need to know -->

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev
lint`.

Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
Deniallugo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[29.3.0](core-v29.2.0...core-v29.3.0)
(2025-09-18)


### Features

* **en:** Check commitment allonside with roothashes
([#4492](#4492))
([6e8f526](6e8f526))
* **en:** Improved en commitment generation error handling
([#4483](#4483))
([1bb82d6](1bb82d6))


### Bug Fixes

* **en:** Add check for commitment in diverged batch
([#4493](#4493))
([e693fd0](e693fd0))
* **en:** allow to disable sanity checks for commitment generation
([#4487](#4487))
([7692f31](7692f31))
* **EN:** properly set chain_id for old batch transactions
([#4488](#4488))
([634b6dd](634b6dd))
* **eth-proof-manager:** don't fail component if proof was incorrect
([#4444](#4444))
([daa1161](daa1161))
* **eth-proof-manager:** verify protocol version and proving mode
alignment
([#4473](#4473))
([99e0423](99e0423))
* **eth-sender:** Fix selector for old batches
([#4489](#4489))
([bb42dcf](bb42dcf))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants