Skip to content

Conversation

@Deniallugo
Copy link
Contributor

@Deniallugo Deniallugo commented Sep 17, 2025

What ❔

During the reorg detection take into account not only root hash, but the whole commitment

Why ❔

We have at least one example, where during wrong execution we have correct root hash, but wrong commitment

Is this a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Operational changes

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zkstack dev fmt and zkstack dev lint.

@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-check-commitment-in-reorg branch from de87218 to 6715649 Compare September 17, 2025 15:17
@Deniallugo Deniallugo requested review from cytadela8 and perekopskiy and removed request for cytadela8 September 17, 2025 15:20
@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-check-commitment-in-reorg branch from 6817e1e to 1f8f2cd Compare September 18, 2025 10:08
Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
@Deniallugo Deniallugo force-pushed the deniallugo-check-commitment-in-reorg branch from 1f8f2cd to 2b31a74 Compare September 18, 2025 11:42
@Deniallugo Deniallugo added this pull request to the merge queue Sep 18, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 6e8f526 Sep 18, 2025
39 checks passed
@Deniallugo Deniallugo deleted the deniallugo-check-commitment-in-reorg branch September 18, 2025 13:52
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 18, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[29.3.0](core-v29.2.0...core-v29.3.0)
(2025-09-18)


### Features

* **en:** Check commitment allonside with roothashes
([#4492](#4492))
([6e8f526](6e8f526))
* **en:** Improved en commitment generation error handling
([#4483](#4483))
([1bb82d6](1bb82d6))


### Bug Fixes

* **en:** Add check for commitment in diverged batch
([#4493](#4493))
([e693fd0](e693fd0))
* **en:** allow to disable sanity checks for commitment generation
([#4487](#4487))
([7692f31](7692f31))
* **EN:** properly set chain_id for old batch transactions
([#4488](#4488))
([634b6dd](634b6dd))
* **eth-proof-manager:** don't fail component if proof was incorrect
([#4444](#4444))
([daa1161](daa1161))
* **eth-proof-manager:** verify protocol version and proving mode
alignment
([#4473](#4473))
([99e0423](99e0423))
* **eth-sender:** Fix selector for old batches
([#4489](#4489))
([bb42dcf](bb42dcf))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
Deniallugo added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
## What ❔

During the reorg detection take into account not only root hash, but the
whole commitment

## Why ❔

We have at least one example, where during wrong execution we have
correct root hash, but wrong commitment

## Is this a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No

## Operational changes
<!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? -->
<!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own
ZK Chain may need to know -->

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev
lint`.

---------

Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
Deniallugo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[29.3.0](core-v29.2.0...core-v29.3.0)
(2025-09-18)


### Features

* **en:** Check commitment allonside with roothashes
([#4492](#4492))
([6e8f526](6e8f526))
* **en:** Improved en commitment generation error handling
([#4483](#4483))
([1bb82d6](1bb82d6))


### Bug Fixes

* **en:** Add check for commitment in diverged batch
([#4493](#4493))
([e693fd0](e693fd0))
* **en:** allow to disable sanity checks for commitment generation
([#4487](#4487))
([7692f31](7692f31))
* **EN:** properly set chain_id for old batch transactions
([#4488](#4488))
([634b6dd](634b6dd))
* **eth-proof-manager:** don't fail component if proof was incorrect
([#4444](#4444))
([daa1161](daa1161))
* **eth-proof-manager:** verify protocol version and proving mode
alignment
([#4473](#4473))
([99e0423](99e0423))
* **eth-sender:** Fix selector for old batches
([#4489](#4489))
([bb42dcf](bb42dcf))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants