Skip to content

Conversation

@Deniallugo
Copy link
Contributor

What ❔

Why ❔

Is this a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Operational changes

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zkstack dev fmt and zkstack dev lint.

coffeexcoin and others added 6 commits December 17, 2025 10:47
## What ❔

Fixes the development setup docs to accurately reflect some missing
information
- cargo-nextest must be installed with `--version 0.9.109 --locked` as
the latest version does not support rust 1.87
- `zkstack dev contracts` must be run before running unit tests
<!-- What are the changes this PR brings about? -->
<!-- Example: This PR adds a PR template to the repo. -->
<!-- (For bigger PRs adding more context is appreciated) -->

## Why ❔

Accurate documentation is helpful for new and external contributors to
be able to set up a working developer environment

<!-- Why are these changes done? What goal do they contribute to? What
are the principles behind them? -->
<!-- The `Why` has to be clear to non-Matter Labs entities running their
own ZK Chain -->
<!-- Example: PR templates ensure PR reviewers, observers, and future
iterators are in context about the evolution of repos. -->

## Is this a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

## Operational changes
<!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? -->
<!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own
ZK Chain may need to know -->
None

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev
lint`.
## What ❔

Use upgrade timestamp as well as block for switching to fusaka blobs

## Why ❔

Unfortunately ETH foundation doesn't provide the exact block for fusaka,
but they have the exact timestamp. So it was decided to use this
timestamp and half an hour before and after this as a safety margin

https://blog.ethereum.org/2025/11/06/fusaka-mainnet-announcement#fusaka-activation

## Is this a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [ ] No

## Operational changes
<!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? -->
<!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own
ZK Chain may need to know -->

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev
lint`.

Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[29.6.0](core-v29.5.0...core-v29.6.0)
(2025-11-17)


### Features

* **api:** add EIP-7966 eth_sendRawTransactionSync method
([#4565](#4565))
([7c4c428](7c4c428))
* bumping versions
([#4555](#4555))
([1cd803d](1cd803d))
* **eth_sender:** Set fusaka upgrade timestamp
([#4571](#4571))
([3b5a9df](3b5a9df))
* Improve proving networks setup
([#4563](#4563))
([42c3f0f](42c3f0f))
* **zkstack:** ensure priority queue is empty before migrating to
gateway ([#4539](#4539))
([a5e1133](a5e1133))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: zksync-era-bot <[email protected]>
## What ❔

- Add stage metrics for `eth_sendRawTransactionSync`


## Why ❔

- `eth_sendRawTransactionSync` is returning slower than sendTransaction
+ waitForTransactionReceipt so adding metrics to see what the cause is

## Is this a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

## Operational changes
<!-- Any config changes? Any new flags? Any changes to any scripts? -->
<!-- Please add anything that non-Matter Labs entities running their own
ZK Chain may need to know -->

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev
lint`.
## What ❔

Supplying the upgrade data for mainnet upgrade fior v29. To generate
call for a chain upgrade it should be provided as an input to `zkstack
dev generate-v29-chain-upgrade` command.

## Why ❔

To allow generation of calldata for chain upgrades.

## Is this a breaking change?
- [ ] Yes
- [x] No

## Operational changes

None

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zkstack dev fmt` and `zkstack dev
lint`.
@Deniallugo Deniallugo requested a review from a team as a code owner December 17, 2025 10:52
@Deniallugo Deniallugo requested review from zksync-admin-bot2 and removed request for a team December 17, 2025 10:52
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 17, 2025

Hey there! 👋🏼

We require pull request titles to follow the Conventional Commits specification and it looks like your proposed title needs to be adjusted.
Examples of valid PR titles:

  • feat(eth_sender): Support new transaction type
  • fix(state_keeper): Correctly handle edge case
  • ci: Add new workflow for linting

Details:

No release type found in pull request title "Merge draft v30". Add a prefix to indicate what kind of release this pull request corresponds to. For reference, see https://www.conventionalcommits.org/

Available types:
 - feat: A new feature
 - fix: A bug fix
 - docs: Documentation only changes
 - style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
 - refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
 - perf: A code change that improves performance
 - test: Adding missing tests or correcting existing tests
 - build: Changes that affect the build system or external dependencies (example scopes: gulp, broccoli, npm)
 - ci: Changes to our CI configuration files and scripts (example scopes: Travis, Circle, BrowserStack, SauceLabs)
 - chore: Other changes that don't modify src or test files
 - revert: Reverts a previous commit

Signed-off-by: Danil <[email protected]>
@Deniallugo Deniallugo merged commit 564fdb1 into kl/medium-interop-support Dec 17, 2025
29 of 40 checks passed
@Deniallugo Deniallugo deleted the merge-draft-v30 branch December 17, 2025 11:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants