Skip to content

Add Preference Center blocks to GrapesJS builder#46

Open
annamunk wants to merge 14 commits into
mautic:mainfrom
annamunk:DPMMA-2341_preference_center
Open

Add Preference Center blocks to GrapesJS builder#46
annamunk wants to merge 14 commits into
mautic:mainfrom
annamunk:DPMMA-2341_preference_center

Conversation

@annamunk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is a continuation of the work from "Added preference center blocks to GrapesJS builder" and introduces preference center blocks to the GrapesJS builder.

I encountered errors related to the preference center and prepared the following fixes:

Please let me know if any additional problems occur. I don't have much experience using these blocks in the old builder, but I tried to recreate their functionality.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks so much for picking this up @annamunk and for snagging the bug fixes as well! 🚀

@jacquesbh
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Hi here!

Hi @RCheesley !

Is there any possibility to merge this PR so we have the preference blocks inside the builder into Mautic?

Thanks!

All the best

@RCheesley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey @jacquesbh thanks for asking! We have not yet had anybody test and code review this PR, which is why it's not yet merged. If you can test it and report back via the Files changed > leave review button then we can get it merged. Check the readme for instructions on how to test!

@RCheesley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hi @jacquesbh just checking in as to how you got on with testing?

@jacquesbh
Copy link
Copy Markdown

jacquesbh commented Apr 2, 2025 via email

@RCheesley
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Yeah the variables work by just typing them, but agree that the blocks are a nicer solution for the marketer!

@RCheesley RCheesley requested a review from adiux April 24, 2025 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request ready-to-test

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants