-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
Restore decoupling #610
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
patrickelectric
merged 9 commits into
mavlink:master
from
joaoantoniocardoso:pr/sink-decoupling
May 28, 2026
Merged
Restore decoupling #610
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
9 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
16c9fcb
src: lib: stream: sink: Broadens sync=false to all other elements, in…
joaoantoniocardoso 6d51605
src: lib: stream: pipeline: Remove remaining queues from pipelines to…
joaoantoniocardoso c38f936
src: lib: stream: sink: Drop proxysrc queue excision to keep decoupling
joaoantoniocardoso a058101
src: lib: stream: gst: Remove unused function
joaoantoniocardoso 7d7d435
src: lib: stream: sink: Extract proxysink/proxysrc creation
joaoantoniocardoso f6f97f4
src: lib: stream: sink: Use common make_proxy_bridge function
joaoantoniocardoso fc18bb8
src: lib: stream: sink: Refactor WebRTCSink to use proxysink/proxysrc…
joaoantoniocardoso 7653fd7
src: lib: stream: Pass video_and_stream_information to the WebRTCSink…
joaoantoniocardoso 498d163
src: lib: stream: Start sink pipelines add addition, not later
joaoantoniocardoso File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just to be sure, we are failing here, but the insert will happen still ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great question. In short, this is keeping the same behavior, which contains a fragility we need to improve. See below.
Each Pipeline has a PipelineRunner, which runs independently. The "Streams" are groups of one Source Pipeline + multiple Sink Pipelines.
When the Source Pipeline of a Stream fails (e.g., if v4l2src's device is closed by Linux), there's a watcher that tears down and recreates the whole Stream (Source Pipeline + each Sink Pipeline).
When a Sink Pipeline of a Stream fails (e.g., if something happens to the socket), it just dies forever.
The lack of communication upstream (from Sink Pipelines to Source Pipelines) was intentional: we don't want the Source or other Sinks to be disturbed by a Sink. What it is lacking is the same recreation strategy used by the Source Pipeline.
Also, in the future, the API should surface the status of each Pipeline Sink of a Stream, but for that, we must semantically separate the Stream concept from the Source Pipeline concept, which today is very liquid/mixed because that was the original design.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that's a pretty fair point.