Skip to content

Conversation

@aditigopalan
Copy link
Collaborator

@aditigopalan aditigopalan commented May 22, 2025

AI Analysis (Fixes #40, #41)

This is done by using AWS Bedrock and Synapse integration. The implementation includes a custom AWS Bedrock agent, hosted as a Synapse agent, which interacts with the Synapse Python client using the Agent class. This approach skips the need for direct API tokens, however the user would still need a Synapse account + PAT to use this feature, instructions in README.

Key Features

  • Custom AWS Bedrock Agent: The agent, named cc-toolkit-agent, provides a summary report in HTML format, offering detailed insights into repository analysis.
  • Synapse Integration: Utilizes the Synapse Python client for seamless interaction with the hosted agent.
  • The summary report outputted is in HTML format and includes comprehensive analysis results.

README Enhancements (Fixes #26)

Key Changes

  • Input CSV Example: Added an example of input.csv in a table/markdown format for better understanding.
  • Syntax Alerts: Highlighted areas still in development to set clear expectations for users.
  • Synapse Upload Requirements: Detailed requirements for uploading to Synapse, including necessary credentials and configuration files.
  • Summaries/Dependencies: Provided summaries and dependencies to ensure users have a clear understanding of the toolkit's requirements and capabilities.

JOSS Analysis & Testing (Fixes #14)

Key Features

Captured in JOSSAnalysis.nf:

  • README Content Testing: Analyzes README content for key sections, including statement of need, installation instructions, and example usage. Each section is scored based on completeness and clarity.
  • Requirements.txt Content Testing: Validates dependency file contents, ensuring proper specification of dependencies with versions. Similar checks are implemented for other languages.
  • Unit Tests Execution: The new TestExecutor module runs tests in appropriate containers, providing detailed results, including pass/fail counts and test framework used.
  • JOSS Review Criteria Integration: All tests are designed based on JOSS paper review criteria, with a scoring system that aligns with JOSS expectations.

Configuring CODEOWNERS (Fixes #43)

…odule - Add proper error handling for missing status files - Fix Python f-string formatting - Improve file reading logic for better reliability
docs: update README with AI analysis details and contribution guidelines

- Clarify that AI analysis is optional and requires Synapse agent ID
- Add specific Synapse agent ID (LOWYSX3QSQ) in examples
- Reorder output files to highlight AI analysis as final report
- Add note about AI analysis providing qualitative summary
- Update output file descriptions to clarify metrics vs summary
- Add reference to new CONTRIBUTING.md file
- Rename SynapseAnalysis process to AIAnalysis for clarity
- Update module include statement to use new AIAnalysis module
- Remove Generate Report
- Update workflow documentation to reflect AI analysis step
- Add debug print statement for AI input tuple
- Keep Synapse agent ID requirement for AI analysis
- Maintain existing workflow structure and data flow
Create new AIAnalysis.nf module that:
- Uses Synapse agent to analyze repository quality
- Takes Almanack and JOSS results as input
- Generates qualitative analysis and recommendations
- Includes timeout handling (600s) for long-running analyses
- Provides detailed error handling and logging
- Outputs results in JSON format with repository-specific naming

The module integrates with Synapse's AI capabilities to provide:
- High-level summary of repository strengths and weaknesses
- Prioritized recommendations for improvement
- JOSS readiness assessment
- Specific action items for repository enhancement
- Add support for both JSON and CSV input formats
- Implement comprehensive README content analysis
- Add detailed dependency management assessment
- Improve test coverage evaluation
- Add scoring system for JOSS criteria
- Enhance error handling and logging
- Add support for multiple programming languages
- Implement detailed status reporting with improvement suggestions

Key improvements:
- Better handling of different input formats
- More thorough analysis of repository documentation
- Enhanced dependency checking across multiple languages
- Improved test result parsing and scoring
- Better error handling and reporting
@aditigopalan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@BWMac thank you for the suggestions! Ready for review again 🫡

@aditigopalan aditigopalan requested a review from BWMac May 27, 2025 16:26
Copy link
Contributor

@BWMac BWMac left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great work! Just one more comment but LGTM! 🔥 🔥 🔥

@aditigopalan aditigopalan merged commit e7d06f5 into main May 27, 2025
1 check passed
@aditigopalan aditigopalan deleted the feature/gpt-result-interpretation branch May 27, 2025 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

3 participants