Skip to content

Add Xquik x-twitter-scraper skill#1

Open
kriptoburak wants to merge 3 commits into
megalor1:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/add-xquik-scraper-skill
Open

Add Xquik x-twitter-scraper skill#1
kriptoburak wants to merge 3 commits into
megalor1:mainfrom
kriptoburak:codex/add-xquik-scraper-skill

Conversation

@kriptoburak

@kriptoburak kriptoburak commented May 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Add Xquik x-twitter-scraper to the app-backed skill catalog.
  • Place it near the existing X/Twitter skill entry.
  • Use localized, source-backed wording for tweet search, user tweets, follower export, media download, monitoring, webhooks, MCP, SDK, and confirmation-gated write workflows.
  • Rebuild the branch from current main so the PR changes only src/data/skills.ts.

Validation

  • git diff --check upstream/main...HEAD
  • npm run build
  • npm audit --omit=dev --json (0 production vulnerabilities)
  • Verified the GitHub repository returns HTTP 200.
  • Verified the docs link redirects to HTTP 200.
  • Scanned the changed entry for secret-like, internal-provider, pricing, and disallowed badge references.

Note: npm run lint is currently blocked because this repo defines an eslint script but does not install eslint. I did not add dependencies for this listing-only change.

@megalor1 megalor1 force-pushed the main branch 30 times, most recently from 761cfcc to 85c0cfe Compare May 13, 2026 07:01
@kriptoburak kriptoburak force-pushed the codex/add-xquik-scraper-skill branch from 0cea183 to f0860a0 Compare May 14, 2026 14:45
@kriptoburak kriptoburak force-pushed the codex/add-xquik-scraper-skill branch from f0860a0 to 3b62bff Compare May 14, 2026 18:32
@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Rebased the branch on current main and force-pushed head 3b62bff, so the PR changed-file list is scoped back to src/data/skills.ts only.

Validation after the rebuild:

  • git diff --check origin/main...HEAD
  • npm ci
  • npm run build
  • npm audit --omit=dev --json reports 0 production vulnerabilities
  • GitHub repo link returns HTTP 200
  • Docs link redirects to HTTP 200
  • Scoped changed-entry scan found no secret-like text, internal-provider wording, pricing claims, or disallowed badge references

Target-side note: npm run lint still cannot run because the repo defines an eslint script but eslint is not installed. I left dependencies untouched because this PR only adds one catalog row.

@megalor1 megalor1 force-pushed the main branch 5 times, most recently from 1ecaa90 to b90768b Compare May 15, 2026 09:34
@kriptoburak kriptoburak force-pushed the codex/add-xquik-scraper-skill branch from 3b62bff to d7ec641 Compare May 15, 2026 11:20
@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Rebased this on current main again and force-pushed head d7ec641.

The PR changed-file list is back to only src/data/skills.ts; the unintended README.md churn is gone. I also rebuilt locally with npm run build, and the existing dependency audit warnings are from the target dependency set rather than this one-file listing change.

@kriptoburak kriptoburak force-pushed the codex/add-xquik-scraper-skill branch from d7ec641 to 481e01d Compare May 15, 2026 13:58
@megalor1 megalor1 force-pushed the main branch 13 times, most recently from 0cf203d to 9d70c1e Compare May 17, 2026 08:46
This reverts commit 23ff5d7.
@kriptoburak

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Re-scoped this PR after GitHub showed README churn again.

Pushed head 4f4caa5, and the visible diff is back to only src/data/skills.ts.

Validation:

  • git diff --check upstream/main...HEAD
  • npm ci
  • npm run build
  • npm audit --omit=dev --json reports 0 production vulnerabilities
  • Xquik repo link returns HTTP 200
  • Xquik docs URL redirects to https://docs.xquik.com/api-reference/overview, which returns HTTP 200

Target-side note: the fork default branch still has existing dependency alerts, but this PR only changes the one catalog entry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants