Skip to content

Conversation

@parshvadaftari
Copy link
Contributor

Description

This PR revamps the mem0ai to 1.0.0 version which includes a lot of features.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Refactor (does not change functionality, e.g. code style improvements, linting)
  • Documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Unit Test
  • Test Script (please provide)

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Maintainer Checklist

  • closes #xxxx (Replace xxxx with the GitHub issue number)
  • Made sure Checks passed

@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
<Note type="info">
📢 Announcing our research paper: Mem0 achieves <strong>26%</strong> higher accuracy than OpenAI Memory, <strong>91%</strong> lower latency, and <strong>90%</strong> token savings! [Read the paper](https://mem0.ai/research) to learn how we're revolutionizing AI agent memory.
Mem0 achieves <strong>26%</strong> higher accuracy than OpenAI Memory, <strong>91%</strong> lower latency, and <strong>90%</strong> token savings. [Read our research paper](https://mem0.ai/research).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's change the banner to 1.0.0 being available.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay and are we keeping a banner for the paper? If not then where will we keep the paper link?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, lets remove the banner related to paper launch since this is old.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@parshvadaftari parshvadaftari Oct 15, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed it and have kept only 1.0.0 release announcement there. Will add the link once the release is made.

)
```
</CodeGroup>

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why did we remove this?

# Search with LLM reranking
results = memory.search("What programming topics is the user studying?", user_id="david")

for result in results['results']:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we show the output for the given input?

Copy link
Collaborator

@deshraj deshraj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall looks good but some comments.

# Check for index by name regardless of version-specific format differences
return any(
idx.get("index_name") == index_name or
idx.get("index name") == index_name or
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we have spaces in some places in the keyname? We should get that fixed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we have kept spaces for backwards compatibility 3.4 or later changes the functionality so this is kept for making it compatible. Moving forward we'll keep it for the latest versions itself.

@parshvadaftari parshvadaftari merged commit 394203d into main Oct 16, 2025
8 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants