Skip to content

feat: Repack esp32 GDBs to upgrade to 16#97

Closed
biggerfisch wants to merge 9 commits into
masterfrom
avery/06-30-feat_repack_esp32_gdbs_to_upgrade_to_16
Closed

feat: Repack esp32 GDBs to upgrade to 16#97
biggerfisch wants to merge 9 commits into
masterfrom
avery/06-30-feat_repack_esp32_gdbs_to_upgrade_to_16

Conversation

@biggerfisch
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@biggerfisch biggerfisch commented Jun 30, 2025

Summary

We've been building this GDB from source for a long time.

However, that's getting more and more annoying to keep up-to-date.

This tries to use existing builds instead, merely repacking as we need with distinct python versions.

This also allows us to merge in the gdb-xtensa-lx106-elf package and avoid needing 2 packages.

Test Plan

  • Build tests
  • (private integration tests)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

biggerfisch commented Jun 30, 2025

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@biggerfisch biggerfisch changed the base branch from avery/06-30-feat_build_elfutils_with_updated_versions to graphite-base/97 June 30, 2025 11:25
@biggerfisch biggerfisch force-pushed the avery/06-30-feat_repack_esp32_gdbs_to_upgrade_to_16 branch from 69724ce to 6f5fb14 Compare June 30, 2025 11:25
@biggerfisch biggerfisch changed the base branch from graphite-base/97 to master June 30, 2025 11:25
@biggerfisch biggerfisch force-pushed the avery/06-30-feat_repack_esp32_gdbs_to_upgrade_to_16 branch from 5a3664e to a643fdc Compare December 16, 2025 12:29
@biggerfisch biggerfisch marked this pull request as ready for review December 19, 2025 10:25
@biggerfisch biggerfisch requested review from a team and noahp as code owners December 19, 2025 10:25
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure the Pre-built ones can load coredump .elf files, did you test?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

😅 Ooops - that fails. Back to #93 instead then I guess

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants