Skip to content

test: Add config helper utility (Fixes #45364)#45373

Open
yeelam-gordon wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test/orch-45364
Open

test: Add config helper utility (Fixes #45364)#45373
yeelam-gordon wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
test/orch-45364

Conversation

@yeelam-gordon
Copy link
Contributor

Mock PR for orchestration test. Fixes #45364

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yeelam-gordon yeelam-gordon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Review Summary - PR #45373

Review for: test: Add config helper utility (Fixes #45364)

Medium Severity Findings

Finding 1 - Stub Implementation (Functionality)
📁 src/common/utils/TestConfigHelper.h (lines 12-14)

The GetConfigValue function always returns the default value without reading from any actual configuration source. This is a stub implementation that could mislead callers into thinking configuration is being read.

Recommendation: Either mark this clearly as a mock/stub in the function name (e.g., GetConfigValueMock) or implement actual config reading logic.


Finding 2 - Hardcoded Return Value (Functionality)
📁 src/common/utils/TestConfigHelper.h (lines 16-18)

IsFeatureEnabled always returns true regardless of the feature name. This could mask disabled features during testing or lead to incorrect behavior if used in production code paths.

Recommendation: Consider either:

  • Renaming to IsFeatureEnabledMock to clarify it's a stub
  • Add a // TODO: Implement actual feature flag checking comment
  • Or implementing actual feature flag lookup

Finding 3 - Missing include guard alternative (Repo Patterns)
📁 src/common/utils/TestConfigHelper.h (line 4)

While #pragma once is used (which is fine), the <optional> header is included but never used in the code.

Recommendation: Remove the unused #include <optional> to keep includes minimal.


Summary

This appears to be a mock/test utility file based on the comments, but the function names don't indicate this. If this is intentional test infrastructure, consider making the mock nature explicit in naming.

Overall: The PR is marked as a mock for orchestration testing, which explains the stub implementations. However, adding this file to src/common/utils/ (a production code location) without clear "Mock" naming could cause confusion.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yeelam-gordon yeelam-gordon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Review Summary for #45373

Files Changed: 1 (TestConfigHelper.h)
Findings >= Medium: 3

Summary

This PR adds a mock configuration helper. While functional for testing, there are repository pattern issues that should be addressed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@yeelam-gordon yeelam-gordon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated PR Review - Medium+ Severity Findings

This review identified 4 medium-severity issues that should be addressed:

# Issue Line Severity
1 Unused include (<optional>) 7 Medium
2 Test file in production location 1 Medium
3 Code formatting inconsistency (K&R vs Allman) 13-21 Medium
4 Hardcoded return values 13-18 Medium

See inline comments for details and suggested fixes.

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR adds a new C++ header file TestConfigHelper.h with stub configuration helper functions, claiming to fix issue #45364. However, the linked issue requests adding XML documentation comments to a C# ModuleHelper class, which is unrelated to this change. The PR description explicitly states this is a "Mock PR for orchestration test" that should not be merged.

Changes:

  • Adds a new header file src/common/utils/TestConfigHelper.h with two inline template/function stubs for configuration management

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[TEST] Mock Issue 2: Add XML doc comments to ModuleHelper class

1 participant