Skip to content

chore: improve databricks test logging #2367

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

BrendanWalsh
Copy link
Collaborator

Databricks test logs are overly verbose due to exception-based retry logic, obscuring contents.

  • Using new retryUntil utility function which will show progress less verbosely for scenarios where we query an endpoint more frequently while waiting for completion.
  • fixed a bug in tryWithRetries where the final delay passed is ignored.
  • Databricks cluster id and name are printed for easier debugging upon creation.
  • databricks test run name now shows notebook name instead of test1

@BrendanWalsh
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Apr 17, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.62%. Comparing base (e12b0a1) to head (bdc5272).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2367      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.67%   84.62%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         331      331              
  Lines       17180    17180              
  Branches     1544     1544              
==========================================
- Hits        14548    14539       -9     
- Misses       2632     2641       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants