Skip to content

docs: refresh add-aspire-existing-app guidance#693

Merged
IEvangelist merged 16 commits intomainfrom
copilot/existing-app-scenarios
Apr 9, 2026
Merged

docs: refresh add-aspire-existing-app guidance#693
IEvangelist merged 16 commits intomainfrom
copilot/existing-app-scenarios

Conversation

@IEvangelist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@IEvangelist IEvangelist commented Apr 8, 2026

Summary

  • expand the "Choose your AppHost" guidance with alphabetized C# and TypeScript API tables, including addCSharpApp() parity
  • reframe the article around resource modeling and relationships so the section intros emphasize workloads, infrastructure, dependencies, and startup behavior before implementation details
  • update the article to use 13.2.0 package examples, convert telemetry guidance into synced language tabs, remove the redundant integrations section, and simplify the ending into a short conclusion with follow-up links
  • exclude tablists from .sl-steps list padding so embedded tabs render correctly

Validation

  • pnpm lint

IEvangelist and others added 12 commits April 8, 2026 15:12
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@IEvangelist IEvangelist changed the title docs: tailor existing-app scenarios by toolchain docs: refresh add-aspire-existing-app guidance Apr 9, 2026
IEvangelist and others added 2 commits April 9, 2026 13:47
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@IEvangelist IEvangelist marked this pull request as ready for review April 9, 2026 19:08
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 9, 2026 19:08
@IEvangelist IEvangelist enabled auto-merge (squash) April 9, 2026 19:09
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Refreshes the “Add Aspire to an existing app” guide to emphasize resource modeling/relationships, updates examples to Aspire 13.2.0, and improves Steps rendering when Tabs are embedded.

Changes:

  • Expand “Choose your AppHost” with API summary tables for C# and TypeScript.
  • Reframe scenarios around workloads/infrastructure/dependencies and add a Docker Compose scenario.
  • Update package/version examples to 13.2.0 and convert telemetry guidance into synced language tabs.
  • Adjust .sl-steps styling to avoid adding padding to embedded tablists.

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
src/frontend/src/styles/site.css Excludes tablists from .sl-steps list padding to avoid layout issues when Tabs are inside Steps.
src/frontend/src/content/docs/get-started/add-aspire-existing-app.mdx Rewrites/expands the guide content, updates to 13.2.0 examples, adds Compose scenario, and reorganizes telemetry guidance into language tabs.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

IEvangelist and others added 2 commits April 9, 2026 15:21
…app.mdx

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
…app.mdx

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
| API | Description |
| --- | --- |
| `AddContainer()` | Run a prebuilt container image that already exists in your current workflow. |
| `AddCSharpApp()` | Point a file-based AppHost at an existing C# app or `.csproj` without creating a separate AppHost project graph. |
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what does "without creating a separate AppHost project graph." mean?

| `AddExecutable()` | Fall back to a custom command when a dedicated hosting API does not exist yet. |
| `AddJavaScriptApp()`, `AddNodeApp()`, `AddViteApp()` | Model JavaScript and TypeScript workloads, from general package-script apps to Node entrypoints and Vite frontends. |
| `AddParameter()` | Define reusable config values and secrets for the resources in your model. |
| `AddPostgres()`, `AddRedis()` | Add shared infrastructure with first-class integrations and connection wiring. |
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These seem out of place. why are these 2 special?

## Next steps

After you have Aspire orchestrating the existing app, a few natural next steps are:
At this point, you have the core workflow: describe the resources your app needs, connect the workloads that depend on them, and let Aspire run the system together during local development. From there, you can deepen the setup incrementally instead of trying to remodel the entire app at once.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From there, you can deepen the setup incrementally instead of trying to remodel the entire app at once.

This line feels off.

@IEvangelist IEvangelist merged commit d1710e4 into main Apr 9, 2026
6 checks passed
@IEvangelist IEvangelist deleted the copilot/existing-app-scenarios branch April 9, 2026 21:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants