Skip to content

Conversation

@amarpMSFT
Copy link
Collaborator

@amarpMSFT amarpMSFT commented Jan 24, 2025

Now that we know which AgilitySDK version will support hash bypass, the "TBD" in the spec can be replaced with the actual version.

Also consider whether to move this out of "proposal" state, perhaps as soon as that AgilitySDK becomes available? Actually might need to stay in proposal state until any DXC side changes are finished, such as publishing dxil.dll?

Now that we know which AgilitySDK version will support hash bypass, the "TBD" in the spec can be replaced with the actual version. 

Also consider whether to move this out of "proposal" state, perhaps as soon as that AgilitySDK becomes available?
@amarpMSFT amarpMSFT requested review from damyanp and llvm-beanz and removed request for llvm-beanz January 24, 2025 17:41
@damyanp damyanp requested review from bogner, pow2clk and tex3d January 28, 2025 22:15
@damyanp
Copy link
Member

damyanp commented Jan 28, 2025

@bogner / @tex3d / @pow2clk - we just need one more review. Please feel free to squash&merge this when you're ready.

@llvm-beanz llvm-beanz merged commit 57c39aa into main Feb 4, 2025
1 check passed
llvm-beanz pushed a commit to llvm-beanz/hlsl-specs that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2025
…on (microsoft#373)

Now that we know which AgilitySDK version will support hash bypass, the "TBD" in the spec can be replaced with the actual version. 

Also consider whether to move this out of "proposal" state, perhaps as soon as that AgilitySDK becomes available?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants