Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move Pools to Global Per Proc #4935

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 24, 2025
Merged

Move Pools to Global Per Proc #4935

merged 3 commits into from
Mar 24, 2025

Conversation

nibanks
Copy link
Member

@nibanks nibanks commented Mar 20, 2025

Description

In preparation for creating official partitions, moving all pool allocations into the per-proc structs at the MsQuic layer.

Testing

Automation

Documentation

N/A

@nibanks nibanks requested a review from a team as a code owner March 20, 2025 23:41
@nibanks nibanks added the Area: Core Related to the shared, core protocol logic label Mar 20, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 86.47%. Comparing base (8976803) to head (807a07b).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #4935      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.79%   86.47%   -1.33%     
==========================================
  Files          56       56              
  Lines       17723    17722       -1     
==========================================
- Hits        15560    15325     -235     
- Misses       2163     2397     +234     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@nibanks nibanks merged commit 9ebe8cc into main Mar 24, 2025
421 of 425 checks passed
@nibanks nibanks deleted the per-proc-pools branch March 24, 2025 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Core Related to the shared, core protocol logic
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants