[WIP] Modifications to Card Component Based on User Feedback#26165
Draft
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intofoundry_models_pagefrom
Draft
[WIP] Modifications to Card Component Based on User Feedback#26165Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intofoundry_models_pagefrom
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intofoundry_models_pagefrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Coding agent has begun work on Modifications to Card Component Based on User Feedback and will replace this description as work progresses.
See problem context
The following is a snapshot of a chat conversation between a user and an AI coding assistant. Prioritize later messages in the conversation.
User: For the cards, we can: drop the alias tag. V1 can be at the bottom, as there's no download button / doesn't need to be. We also don't need a view details button. Add an icon beside the license, and 'chat-completion' can be capitalized.
Also, let me know what fields the 'Custom' and 'Unknown' conform to.
AI: I'll help you modify the cards based on your requirements. First, let me understand the current structure by examining the codebase to find where these cards are implemented.
AI: Let me search more specifically for the card component and the model data structure:
AI: Now I can see the card structure! Let me also check the types file to understand the data structure better:
AI: Now let me look for the fields that determine what "Custom" and "Unknown" represent by checking the service file:
AI: Perfect! Now I can see the structure and understand what needs to be modified. Based on the code, I can see that:
CustomandUnknownappear to be related to theAI: and
AI: fields
chat-completionappears to be a taskType value that should be capitalizedLet me make the required changes to the card component:
AI:
AI:
AI:
AI:
AI: Perfect! Now I've made all the requested changes to the card component. Let me answer your question about the "Custom" and "Unknown" fields based on what I found in the code:
Summary of Changes Made:
AI:
AI: ) to the bottom section with downloads
Fields that "Custom" and "Unknown" conform to:
Based on my analysis of the service code:
"Custom" appears in:
AI: ** field - When the model framework cannot be determined from the API data, it defaults to 'ONNX', but "Custom" likely appears when there are non-standard frameworks
AI:
"Unknown" appears in:
AI: ** field - When the task type cannot be determined, it defaults to 'Text Generation', but "Unknown" likely appears for unrecognized task types
AI:
(b.metric as string) || (b.name as string) || 'Unknown'Both of these represent fallback values when the API doesn't provide clear categorization data for the respective fields. The service tries multiple data paths to extract meaningful values before falling back to these generic labels.
User: Get rid of framework and tasktype fields, we can get rid of the download button, we don't need to filter by framework or task type, version can be more prominent
TITLE: Modifications to Card Component Based on User Feedback
USER INTENT: The user aims to further refine the card component by removing certain fields and adjusting the layout and prominence of elements.
TASK DESCRIPTION: The user wants to eliminate the
frameworkandtaskTypefields from the card component, remove the download button, and make the version display more prominent.EXISTING: The assistant has already made several changes to the card component based on the user's initial feedback, including:
PENDING: The following changes need to be implemented:
frameworkandtaskTypefields from the card component.CODE STATE: The following files are relevant to the modifications:
src/routes/models/foundry/service.ts- Contains the logic for the card component and the fields being modified.RELEVANT CODE/DOCUMENTATION SNIPPETS:
frameworkandtaskType:OTHER NOTES: The user has shifted focus from the initial changes to further simplifying the card component by removing unnecessary fields and buttons, indicating a desire for a cleaner and more straightforward design.
Original prompt
Get rid of framework and tasktype fields, we can get rid of the download button, we don't need to filter by framework or task type, version can be more prominent
The following is a snapshot of a chat conversation between a user and an AI coding assistant. Prioritize later messages in the conversation.
User: For the cards, we can: drop the alias tag. V1 can be at the bottom, as there's no download button / doesn't need to be. We also don't need a view details button. Add an icon beside the license, and 'chat-completion' can be capitalized.
Also, let me know what fields the 'Custom' and 'Unknown' conform to.
AI: I'll help you modify the cards based on your requirements. First, let me understand the current structure by examining the codebase to find where these cards are implemented.
AI: Let me search more specifically for the card component and the model data structure:
AI: Now I can see the card structure! Let me also check the types file to understand the data structure better:
AI: Now let me look for the fields that determine what "Custom" and "Unknown" represent by checking the service file:
AI: Perfect! Now I can see the structure and understand what needs to be modified. Based on the code, I can see that:
CustomandUnknownappear to be related to theAI: and
AI: fields
chat-completionappears to be a taskType value that should be capitalizedLet me make the required changes to the card component:
AI:
AI:
AI:
AI:
AI: Perfect! Now I've made all the requested changes to the card component. Let me answer your question about the "Custom" and "Unknown" fields based on what I found in the code:
Summary of Changes Made:
AI:
AI: ) to the bottom section with downloads
Fields that "Custom" and "Unknown" conform to:
Based on my analysis of the service code:
"Custom" appears in:
AI: ** field - When the model framework cannot be determined from the API data, it defaults to 'ONNX', but "Custom" likely appears when there are non-standard frameworks
AI:
"Unknown" appears in:
AI: ** field - When the task type cannot be determined, it defaults to 'Text Generation', but "Unknown" likely appears for unrecognized task types
AI:
(b.metric as string) || (b.name as string) || 'Unknown'Both of these represent fallback values when the API doesn't provide clear categorization data for the respective fields. The service tries multiple data paths to extract meaningful values before falling back to these generic labels.
User: Get rid of framework and tasktype fields, we can get rid of the download button, we don't need to filter by framework or task type, version can be more prominent
TITLE: Modifications to Card Component Based on User Feedback
USER INTENT: The user aims to further refine the card component by removing certain fields and adjusting the layout and prominence of elements.
TASK DESCRIPTION: The user wants to eliminate the
frameworkandtaskTypefields from the card component, remove the download button, and make the version display more prominent.EXISTING: The assistant has already made several changes to the card component based on the user's initial feedback, including:
PENDING: The following changes need to be implemented:
frameworkandtaskTypefields from the card component.CODE STATE: The following files are relevant to the modifications:
src/routes/models/foundry/service.ts- Contains the logic for the card component and the fields being modified.RELEVANT CODE/DOCUMENTATION SNIPPETS:
frameworkandtaskType:OTHER NOTES: The user has shifted focus from the initial changes to further simplifying the card component by removin...
💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a $200 gift card! Click here to start the survey.